long. please remember that everyone charged in this bill of indictment is presumed innocent. specifically, the indictment brings felony charges against donald john trump, rudolph william luis giuliani, john charles eastman, mark randele meadows, john cheeseborough, jeffrey clark, jenna lyn ellis, ray stallings smith the third, robert david shelley, michael a roman, david james schaffer, sean micah treasure steel,
meadows. and he is throughout this. you know, there s a separate account at 28, which is the brad raffensperger call, where it is donald trump and mark meadows. but mark meadows has numerous acts in furtherance of that larger rico conspiracy. and she had told us that she was going to be interested in what s happening across the country. and it makes sense. if you are a georgia juror, you re gonna be thinking, why did it just happened here? doesn t make any sense. why would you just do that here? so she wanted to tell the whole story. as she said, she thinks jurors have common sense. they want to hear it. and that s what she did. n se and then, the design of e criminal conspiracy, it helps what they are trying to do in georgia, if they can first do it in arizona. if they can do it in other states, and there are several other states mentioned here. i was wondering the same thing, alex, as soon as i thought. it s it s in many different sections of the indictment
given how public this, is given that this is not even the first indictment having to do with donald trump s alleged attempts to steal an election. we what will we learn that is new? and you quickly found something that we had not heard of when it comes to act 19 in the 161 actually count. this goes back to december, it says that donald trump and mark meadows, his chief of staff, directed johnny mcentee, john mcentee, who is a senior official in the white house at the time, to come up with a plan to disrupt and delay the january 6th proceedings. to me that really struck out because rarely do we see in documents trump directed so and so to do something very specific. and in this case, it was something that was clearly written. it was a written planned to disrupt january 6th. and that goes against a lot of the arguments that you hear from trump s attorneys. which is that this is all
victory joe biden had. that is county, donald j trump and mark randele meadows are charged with the offensive solicitation of a violation of oath by public officer, referring to brad raffensperger, very specifically. the case that we heard from coffee county s sydney powell and others whose names might not be as familiar to people, with the offensive conspiracy to commit election fraud. and this has to do with sydney powell entering into a contract and causing employees of this firm, this law firm, where i think it is the law, from sullivan strickler, to travel from atlanta to coffee county, quote, for the purpose of willfully tampering with assad electronic ballots markers. and toppling machines which were overt acts to affect the object of the conspiracy. so here all of these new stories, plus one cnn broke yesterday. all of these news stories that we thought were fishy, and funny melissa saying that it is not just fishy, that s a crime. yes, and it goes, you think
also, jack smith says hands of mark meadows, which signals that mark meadows, despite being corrupt and horrible, is cooperating. she puts her hands on mark meadows in this. so you have got a very different player that just stepped on the field with a very different playbook and a very different sense of what justice looks like. i think the people that i am hearing from are very, very proud because this rico stuff, conspiracy stuff, you ve got kids in neighborhoods across this country that have gone to jail on rico charges, conspiracy charges. if you ve got kids in jails who were standing outside of the convenience store, their front went inside and did something stupid, and now everybody they know-ism jail. we are very familiar with the book, the library, half of amazon.com being thrown at us when somebody does something wrong and so this is actually what justice looks like. if you say you don t want a two tiered justice system, this is what not having a two tiered justice system look