of the weapon. so a lot of that has stood with the culture that was established by the producers. and their failure, they had the option an opportunity to hire while season trained professionals to do this work. and they opted to make other situations. and that was really the beginning of the end for things on rest. neil, mark, i appreciate it, thank you, just ahead we re gonna discuss what the white house said one of the nation s top intelligence officials to ukraine s fear of a major spring offensive.
authorities, at 1:14 pm. can you identify a body with broken teeth? it is a very specific, so disturbing to think about. mark, walshe s defense attorney say the prosecution isn t strong. as a criminal defense attorney, do you agree? what she said was, don t tell media before you give to me. look, the discovery hasn t begun. i will give this purdue. feeling she could say is, let s do this in court, not in the media. how dare you give it out before i get it in the normal course of business? that is the only thing that you could say. don t forget, a defense attorney at this point has to say very little. they have no idea yet what the defense is going to be. they don t know the true strength of the case or where they might fit litigation or
thought is, this case should not end up in trial where the risk is a life sentence but work something out with the prosecutor once you ve crossed your ts and dotted your is. mark o mara, mary ellen and john, thank you. a special edition of 360. forensic scientists will join us and elie honig for a close look at the aspect of this case coming up at 9:00 p.m. eastern. the white house s new strategy for getting ahead of the clarssified documents story and the president s attempt to minimizing his own problems. caitlin collins and maggie haberman join me for that. the george santos story, santos prompted to raise money for his dog for lifesaving surgery but then ran off with the money.
stupid with walshe with these google searches, et cetera. but the idea here is, to mark s point, two things mental state and mitigation i think the focus is going to be one of the things i would want to do is look at the history, look back. not at about what happened after she went missing, but what this relationship was all about how many domestic violence calls were made in the course of this relationship? subpoenaed owes 9-1-1 calls. because, the more we can show that there is no premeditation the less or the degree of crime, like mark said. and it s more like a heat of passion killing. then also mitigation. i really don t know what is up with this guy. we have got to take a deep dive into his mental state, afflictions, addictions, all of those things. all our clients, all the defendants think they can walk. but not all defendants walk. so i think a victory is relative. and in this case, it is about really reducing the degree of crime and then looking at mitigating factors.
right. which goes to a lot of premeditation, but about the cover-up. but i keep coming back to precedent here, which, is the john smith case. his first wife disappeared. they did not find a body. the second wife disappeared, they found a body. his third wife, he was on, to then they found bones from somebody else. he has been to trial twice, he has been convicted twice. he is going for a third time starting in a couple of days. but look right here in the same courthouse in massachusetts. and that joe romano case, the facts are remarkably the same. he said, my wife was killed by drug dealer she owed money to. she was an iron worker, involved with bad people. but the evidence, the saw, the bloody mattress, the cover-up, never found a body. he is doing life. john miller, appreciate it. mark o mara, sara azari thank you very much stay with us. a former colleague of ana speaks with us about today s arraignment and the effort to keep his children together. al.