time. how important could he be? if he is indeed cooperating with them, as you opponent out he was with the vice president throughout the day at the capitol. he informs communication with mark meadows talking about the vice president s well-being and that they intended to follow through with their responsibility, but perhaps more important they can speak to the president s mind-set and president trump and others around him. trying to convince the vice president to send them back to the states and effectively overturn the election results. he was privy to the arguments being made, and if he agrees to cooperate fully the committee could learn a lot of new
selected these four subpoenas first is they are all part of the bigger puzzle of the what i will call the plot. which is sort of catching the idea you can point at steve bannon for that. there is the talk of a meeting back in december where he tells trump to focus on january 6th. then there is the meeting the day before at the willard hotel. you have scavino promoting january 6th, and mark meadows talking with department of justice lawyers about ways to undermine the election. so each one of these people, including patel, who has a hand in the security of it, has a role to play in the plot to stop joe biden s lawful decree and award the election to donald trump. it s actual low very clear when you look at everything.
bret: they wanted to do it in three phases. the senators who say they have a parliamentary trick potentially are trying to do it in one. that is what s so hard about taking a vote where you don t know where it s going. you don t know if there is going to be second phase or third phase and you of your own party saying don t climb this mountai mountain. if you re a house member who is conflicted, it s not a good place to be. you heard mark meadows talking, he said we are trying to get to yes. 30 or 40 no votes. it s a long way to tomorrow. there is a recess coming up. they are going to face angry crowds at home. they have to do this before april 7. bret: the angry crowds are not just republicans, angry crowds for democrats. quickly, what does this mean for the trump agenda as we watched
bret: they wanted to do it in three phases. the senators who say they have a parliamentary trick potentially are trying to do it in one. that is what s so hard about taking a vote where you don t know where it s going. you don t know if there is going to be second phase or third phase and you of your own party saying don t climb this mountai mountain. if you re a house member who is conflicted, it s not a good place to be. you heard mark meadows talking, he said we are trying to get to yes. 30 or 40 no votes. it s a long way to tomorrow. there is a recess coming up. they are going to face angry crowds at home. they have to do this before april 7. bret: the angry crowds are not just republicans, angry crowds for democrats. quickly, what does this mean for the trump agenda as we watched