hearing is days away. federal grand jury indicted former trump advisor peter navarro for defying the january six committee. he was boarding a flight to nashville. they intercepted me getting on the plane, and they put me in handcuffs and brought me here. they put me in like irons. they stick me in a cell. by the, way i was in john hinckley cell. they thought that was an important historical note. and new responses today after the doj chose not to charge former trump chief of staff mark meadows, or his deputy scavino. that attorney for meadows told nbc, the results speak for itself. and the attorney for scavino said, we are grateful the doj exercised sound judgment and deciding not to prosecute this case given the substantial flaws in the legal basis of the committee s subpoena and the issues of executive privilege presented. now right now in texas, a uvalde rallies being held in san antonio, texas, this for the survive texas this is the same legislative body that
finder, but also the person who knows the law. the jurors of the fact finders and they apply the facts to the law in this instance judge jones sitting in his capacity was also determining the credibility of the witnesses. so, he saw mark meadows firsthand that the witness box, but then brad raffensperger during his direct state played those four clips and they were clips directly from that, quote, perfect call that donald trump happened on january 2nd 2021. but, we heard mark meadows saying we. and i want to emphasize this. mark meadows uses the word we all the time. when he was on direct lawyers, he said oh that just my very gracious we have not trying to take credit for something i learned as being a politician. we do this, we do that, but it really didn t mean me, i wasn t included. but then on this call into the clips, you heard mark meadows say, well we would like to make sure we can get our hands on that voter data and we d like to see if we can get this taken care of kind of t
lawyers, he said oh that just my very gracious we have not trying to take credit for something i learned as being a politician. we do this, we do that, but it really didn t mean me, i wasn t included. but then on this call into the clips, you heard mark meadows say, well we would like to make sure we can get our hands on that voter data and we d like to see if we can get this taken care of kind of thing. it does not, it s strange quickly to say that when i m saying,, we if i m mark meadows i m not including myself. i m supporting myself in the trump campaign. he tried to make sure was very clear, he had, quote, no official or unofficial trump campaigns but he really took a flyer trying to convince federal judge that there are no bounce to his role as a chief of staff. he literally said i have no bounds to the roles of chief of staff. katie phang, the moral here is that audio recordings and email records can come back to bite you in the courtroom. thank you so much for joining me. t
that s the topic we ve heard throughout the investigation. almost everyone we are talking about was close to donald trump. there are executive issues, executive privilege issues there. as we mentioned the statements we heard the attorney for mark meadows say, the results speak for themselves. those results or a real defeat for the january six committee. the january six committee is really only a strong and powerful and effective as the department of justice less them be. as it relates to who s appearing in front of the committee and compelling those folks to do so. while john hinckley may not have a comment on any of this, peter navarro certainly does. but there is essentially acting as a judge, jury, an executioner. their mission, their clear mission, it s to prove donald trump from running for president in 2020, for being elected as president.
prosecute him. the fact that a subject of the investigation is not willing to talk doesn t mean you have to gif up on that subject. what you should do is as a prosecutor, as an investigator is exactly what the committee is doing here. go to the people around him, go to the people who are willing to come forward, who saw things, who heard things. the fact that he was there testifying for six or seven hours, that was a lot of time for a prosecutor or investigator to spend with somebody. you don t spend that much time with somebody unless you think they have valuable information. six or seven hours a long time for this you think? yeah, i mean, you can get through an awful lot, don. you and i can get through a heck of a lot of material in three or four minutes. imagine how much you can get through in six or seven hours. i would want to know everything that happened on that day. i would want to know every conversation he had with mark meadow, even more importantly conversations he may n