so you re covered. on-premise and in the cloud. you can run things the way you want your team, ours or a mix of both. with the nation s largest ip network. from the most innovative company. bring on today with comcast business. powering possibilities.™ attorney s office to pursue justice for everyone. but like so many of my colleagues, i resigned in protest because chesa boudin interfered in every single case and failed to do his job. the office is absolutely in disarray right now. chesa dissolved my unit prosecuting car break-ins. now criminals flock to san francisco because there are no consequences. we can t wait. recall chesa boudin now.
house republicans refusing to testify and comply, what legal options does the committee have? would they pursue those options? so, you and i have been talking for months now about the need for the committee to subpoena other members of congress if they have relevant information. the good news is they ve done it. the bad is that they ve done it in the middle of may with these hearings less than a month away. they have two options, but both are timed out. one, they can duoso a civil junl and ask for an order, but that will take well more than a month. that will take several months. two, they can vote to hold mccarthy and others in contempt. send it to doj for prosecution. but it s realistically too late to get that done. example, the mark meadows case has been sitting with doj for over five months. they ve essentially timed themselves out. it s just ridiculous that you
goldman, he s an msnbc legal analyst, the former house impeachment inquiry majority counsel. and former director of investigations for the house intelligence committee. dan, good to see you, thank you for being with us. i want you to help me interpret this a little bit. things seem to be the committees having a tough, time they can t get all the people they want. there is lots of phone calls and radio leaks, things like that. but raskin says, when these public hearings happen in june, it s going to change public opinion. because it s going to be so clear what was going on. tell me your interpretation of that. well, i think friday s filing in the mark meadows case starts to reveal a little bit about what jamie raskin is talking about. first, as you pointed out, what s occurred from the time of the election upsurge in uae sixth was a massive effort by a
climate. we all have to care about cli ma. i m zerlina. be sure to follow us on facebook, twitter, tiktok and youtube. more news is coming up right here on msnbc. and a good saturday morning to you. i m katie phang. this news cycle it s been a whil whirlwind including last night s january 6th mark meadows case. several top republicans including jim jordan, matt gaetz and marjorie taylor greene were present at the white house december 21st to strategize ways to overturn the 2020 election including pushing then vice president mike pence to reject on january 6th the legal slate of electors.
route. there s not been any sign at all that congress is willing to even try that. so i think where we are is the worst they would do is send it over to doj. doj could of course charge him. although, the length of time they re taking with the mark meadows case suggests to me they re not at all thinking they want to do that with current officials or even officials who were there under former president trump like mark meadows was. so i don t know there is that much they can do except of course the pressure that all of this publicity brings. a process that would be rife with land mines and overly complex as chairman betty thompson explained it. so i do want to ask you about former doj official jeffrey clark. he was a key player in the plot to overturn the 2020 election. he met with the committee this week. he pleaded the fifth more than 100 times. the panel already voted to hold clark in contempt last year for his lack of cooperation. they paused on moving that referral forward until th