he was perfect in the penalty shoot out against slovenia, who forced spot kicks partly because cristiano ronaldo missed one in extra time. but portugal are through to face france in the last eight in germany with one of the pre tournament favourites needing an own goal in the 85th minute to overcome belgium, as jane dougall reports. for those who have followed the premier league, some familiarfaces in the belgian line up. for france, there was one in the stands. former manchester united player paul pogba, who is appealing a four year ban for a doping offence. he almost saw his french keeper embarrassed. kevin de bruyne s free kick saved. sort of. much has been made of kylian mbappe s skills, dancing past defenders. that would have been special! perhaps his protective mask had obscured the path to goal. could belgium take advantage of france s recent lack of form? not quite. there was nothing between the two sides until late on. and france lead! and it is a cruel blow for belg
with keir starmer. i have spoken today with rishi sunak and i will bring you our interview with him in the next ten minutes. and more military horses have bolted on the streets of london. on bbc london: the lambeth leaseholders claiming they ve been gagged by the council and coming up on bbc news. coming up in sport she missed the championships last year, can emma raducanu make a winning return to centre court? good evening and welcome to the bbc news at six. it s an historic ruling that could have significant consequences. the us supreme court has ruled that donald trump is partially immune from prosecution for actions taken while he was in the white house, over his attempts to overturn the result of the 2020 election. the former president described the decision as a big win . but is it? our north america editor sarah smith is in washington. partially immune? what does this mean? well, first, it means it will be significantly harder now for prosecutors to bring their case
of the 2020 election. the former president describe the decision as a big win. our north american editor sarah smith explained what this decision means a. first sarah smith explained what this decision means a. decision means a. first off, it means it decision means a. first off, it means it will decision means a. first off, it means it will be decision means a. first off, it means it will be now - decision means a. first off, it - means it will be now significantly harderfor means it will be now significantly harder for prosecutors to bring their case against donald trump for election interference in the generous six riot. in that case, john trump is charged with conspiring to obstructjoe biden being certified as president january 6 right. this ruling has said specifically some of the things that would have forced part of that case are covered by immunity and therefore cannot be prosecuted. things like the conversations he had with his vice president mike pence whe
a trophy again. france will play either portugal or slovenia in the quarter finals, with those two meeting right now in frankfurt. it s slovenia s first ever appearance in a major championship knockout stage. they are holding poultry goal, it still goalless at frank for portugal frankfurt, goalless between portugal and slovenia in that last 16 match. uefa have opened an investigation intojude bellingham for a gesture the england player made, following his goal in the euro 2024 win over slovakia. the governing body says it is looking into a potential violation regarding the basic rules of decent conduct by bellingham, who was seen making a crotch grabbing gesture towards the slovakian bench after scoring an overhead kick in stoppage time. he says it was an inside joke intended for close friends. defending champion carlos alcaraz has won on his return to wimbledon, making the second round with a straight sets win over mark lajal while the new world number one is tryin
but when it comes to voting, politicians have struggled to get them out. i m not personally planning to vote. i don t know enough about it. and ijust think, from what i ve heard, they re all as bad as each other. i don t even know how to vote. younger people don t really vote as much as i d say older people do now, so i think there is a lot of confusion on what people are actually voting for, as well. i don t feel like i m informed enough to take a vote, - so i don t want to, like, - change the future of the country when i m not really informed on it, so i don t think i m going to vote this year. unless you vote, you can t really have an opinion. like, you have got the ability to change the world, change the country we live in. at the last general election in 2019, barely half of those aged 18 24 turned out to vote. on the other end of the spectrum, 80% of over 75s did. i m not trying to be horrible, but we are going to be living longer than the people who are more interest