it is. that s the question. mark, legally, you soo the video and say, charge her for that case and if you can charge her for the other, go for it. are we opening up a door we may not want to open? for sure she should be held responsible without question. let s point out the irony. she s in a jail with her teen daughter in the same jail on the same night for unreelated charges. i had to get that out there. it s so unusual. as to the other case there is no law in florida, unfortunately yet to hold parents accountable for what their kids do. i m not averse to creating such a law. it would have to be narrow and parents have to know what s going on or turn their head to a long pattern of abuse that their children are engaged in. it wouldn t be difficult to prove in these cases, dr. adlow. you say the word bullying should
mark, legally, you soo the video and say, charge her for that case and if you can charge her for the other, go for it. are we opening up a door we may not want to open? for sure she should be held responsible without question. let s point out the irony. she s in a jail with her teen daughter in the same jail on the same night for unreelated charges. i had to get that out there. it s so unusual. as to the other case there is no law in florida, unfortunately yet to hold parents accountable for what their kids do. i m not averse to creating such a law. it would have to be narrow and parents have to know what s going on or turn their head to a long pattern of abuse that their children are engaged in. it wouldn t be difficult to prove in these cases, dr. adlow. you say the word bullying should be replaced with assault.
completion of the investigation she ll be charged in that event. as a result of that investigation and the news coverage we discovered this separate event, the video you are looking at tonight. it s separate. i don t know if it is totally separate. it s the same actor and arguably the same conduct. is she in custody? what s the status? she is in custody. she s in my custody. she s in the county jail tonight with no bond. she ll go to first appearance in the morning. our detectives did an excellent job moving the case quick and obtaining a war rapt for her arrest. with we got hr in jail this afternoon. the children in request are being monitored by the department of children and family services. they are receiving services as well. thank you. thank you. later in the show we ll be joined by florida attorney mark iglarsh. he filed ap editorial saying
report did that affect your deliberations in any way, no, okay, there you go. megyn: so that the jurors are going to get into the the jurors are going to be cross-examined by the lawyers who tried the case? or i don t know how this judge is going to do this, it could be the judge himself. usually it s the judge himself saying have you taken evidence that wasn t facts that weren t heard in this courtroom, did you do that or did you read this, did this affect your verdict or did you i mean, look, they re loaded questions, or did you reach the verdict based on the evidence you heard, yes, judge, i did it on my la la la. megyn: i didn t do anything wrong, your had nor your had nor, i swear. i d be number one, telling you i told you not to put me on this jury! arthur, mark, thank you. we ll continue to follow this throughout the next hour and see if we get any exchange between the judge and jurors. we ll show it to you. we are moments away from witnessing real history in t
effectively tainted this verdict. joining me now to discuss it, former prosecutors, now defense attorneys, arthur idala and mark iglarsh. roy black is the defense attorney, he s a big, famous defense attorney. he lost. he lost this case at trial and that didn t come as a shock to any of us that watched the case, given this guy s action and what he blew on the breathalyzer. arthur, now they re going after the jurors, suggesting they didn t bee heaive as they were supposed to and now what s this business about the judge? what evidence do they have that the judge is biased? they have some evidence that the judge received communications from one juror. there was basically i think they used this term, it was a whistleblower juror who came forward after the verdict. megyn: the alternate. she said there were improprieties here and i tried reach out to the judge, i called, but nobody called me back and that s why i m now calling you, defense counsel, and the defense attorney is saying wa