Name on it as the author so we can vote when we explorer the idea of looking at people that receive a tacks break from the city i think that creating that relationship they have voluntarily apply for the tax break we can ask them how theyre doing in making sure that women are being paid equally for the same work that men do i ask a motion to duplicate the file and, of course, the one that remains here move forward. Is there a second second by supervisor campos colleagues, any discussion on that to duplicate . Okay. Well maam, okay. On the motion to duplicate and send back to Committee Discussions supervisor campos. Thank you let me say this is i think its really important we take a vote on the ordinance as proposed today and as i understand the motion by supervisor avalos well be able to do that and the reason why i seconded the motion i think that as the current version of the legislation moves forward it is appropriate for us in committee to discuss whether or not we should add to th
For making the implementation dates until january 2016 and, of course, for continuing the item for the three weeks to look at the legislation so i thank you for that i do have a conversation with the Supervisors Office today and i know youre not a psychic but i brought up things that youve disregard with so today, i was prepared to speak to how the searchandseizure board i want them to address the threshold amount which dcwf has brought to me and others i understand that you couldnt have foreseen i would propose this amendment but during this review process theyll seriously consider the nonprofit do grantees ive mentioned at our last meeting prior to the continuance to make sure that the sires body to spell out how their collecting data that some of our nonprofits or contractors are submitting already to our various City Department and repurpose them in a way not to be bumping how it is youre going to analyze the data and how it is were going to be catering this legislation it is one i
That to apply the final points my understanding supervisor tang st. Is going to release a couple of amendment to the board of supervisors i think there is nothing in this motion this ordinance that precludes that from happening but a need for clarity im happy to do that but the Second Amendment as i understand an amendment to increase the threshold from 50,000 to 100,000 for entities that receive city grants im going to speak against that amendment for a number of reasons one because i believe that we have yet to fully understand the indications were talking about few institutions that will be covered by this ordinance and doubling the threshold would have severe impacts in terms of who is covered by this requirement the second point i think if we have to respect the process thats been followed well have legislation that was introduced several weeks ago we had a hearing at the commission on the status of women no amendments were offered at any of the meetings my understanding is the im
Be the 88 same truth, in fact, the enequality exists by something people are not unconscious thinking about that will benefit not only San Francisco workers but insure that San Francisco continues to lead the way the same way we have on a number of issues we take the example of the domestic partner benefits owners we were the first city to require that those who contract with the city provide the same rights to the same sex couples it led to San Francisco providing the benefits and others the fact we have a responsibility not only to protect our workers bus because of the history of San Francisco leading the way on civil rights issue it impacts what happens to the rest of the state and country much has been said about the impact on Small Businesses and nonprofits on the commission of the status of women at the board of supervisors that issue has been raised there has been the complaint that requiring the reporting of this information is two bumping to comply but without knowing the req
To ask i respectfully ask for your support. Thank you supervisor tang. Thank you first of all, i want to thank supervisor campos for making the implementation dates until january 2016 and, of course, for continuing the item for the three weeks to look at the legislation so i thank you for that i do have a conversation with the Supervisors Office today and i know youre not a psychic but i brought up things that youve disregard with so today, i was prepared to speak to how the searchandseizure board i want them to address the threshold amount which dcwf has brought to me and others i understand that you couldnt have foreseen i would propose this amendment but during this review process theyll seriously consider the nonprofit do grantees ive mentioned at our last meeting prior to the continuance to make sure that the sires body to spell out how their collecting data that some of our nonprofits or contractors are submitting already to our various City Department and repurpose them in a way