People will overwhelmingly approve it. I thought it wouldve approved in 2000 or 2008. Im not sure about the palestinians. I have to be honest about that. I hope it would be the case they would support it as well. Asking the impossible conundrum. , i wroteof years ago an oped in the wall street journal. Was about the birth of it was about the book of jonas. Who the story of a profit say if you dond not repent, you will be destroyed. He realizes this is a nowin situation. If he tells them to repent and they do repent, three years later, they will say, why do we have to repent . Nothing happened. Or if he goes and they do not repent, then he is a false prophet. That is the paradox of prophecy. It is a nowin situation. You can house the same question about the maintenance of american hegemony in the middle east. If america had not maintained hegemony over 50 years, it may be nothing wouldve happened to the u. S. If america had let its guard something worse than 9 11 happened, and the parad
Great threat think we can all get behind. With me now, one of the creators of this new liquid scanner, the Research Centers scientists west berkeley. Thank you for coming onhe show. This is rolling out in london as soon as january. Tell me how it works. What we created was a scanner that could differentiate between e threat items that you would not want to security or benign adamsite your water or wine or liquor that you may be bought at the dutyfree shop. Our systtm is going to use this to technologies to analyze liquid. One is the rf pauls and the other is an ultrasonic scaer. Recombine those two technologies to give us a pass or not pass results. Melissa it looks like where are looking at video along side of you. It looks like hes still have to take the liquids out of your bag and put them through individually. Sure. So this version of the system, you have to measure up the bottles one of the time. Can be combined wh other systems to speed things along that maybeou be integrated int
Great threat think we can all get behind. With me now, one of the creators of this new liquid scanner, the Research Centers scientists west berkeley. Thank you for coming on the show. This is rolling out in london as soon as january. Tell me how it works. What we created was a scanner that could differentiate between the threat items that you would not want to security or benign adamsite your water or wine or liquor that you may be bought at the dutyfree shop. Our systtm is going to use this to technologies to analyze liquid. One is the rf pauls and the other is an ultrasonic scanner. Recombine those two technologies to give us a pass or not pass results. Melissa it looks like where are looking at video along side of you. It looks like hes still have to take the liquids out of your bag and put them through individually. Sure. So this version of the system, you have to measure up the bottles one of the time. Can be combined with other systems to speed things along that maybe could be in
Began nation to nation relations and mutual trade treaty. About a year ago, i had once invited to gentlemen with the names of mr. Dan lytton and peter underwood. They were the descendents of those who founded the University Medical center. These american missionaries came in the late 19 century and founded hospitals and schools. They did many work for the people. In 1945, after the u. S. Rose the tories from the pacific war, korea was liberated from japans colonial rule. However, the disarmament of japanese troops north of 38th parallel was hindered by soviet union. As the soviet union forces occupy the north, the peninsula became divided and suffered structural problems. After our liberation, the United States, who is in charge of militarization for south korea, withdrew their forces before june 29, 1949, as the republic of korea government was established in 1948. They left only 479 members at the Korean Military advisory group. Also, january 1, 1950, the secretary of state, mr. Dean
Contributions, is that creating a problem more for democrats than republicans . Its the icing on the cake to a bad decision which was citizens united, and its going to lead to more money in politics, which i think is bad for democracy. But is it worse for democrats than for republicans . Hard to tell. I mean, i look at this in the democratic governors association, and again, not so loud like a broken record, but we get outspent. We understand that. Were in an environment where we need to raise money so that we can we compete, but weve got to spend our resources more wising than they do. When we do, we win. Thats why we won eight of the last nine races. Im really focused on democratic governors. Im doing it because i believe its going to mack a real difference for america, and we understand that were going to get outspent. We just got to be smarter, have better candidates, and actually implement the policies weve promised to implement, which is jobcreating opportunities for middle class