poured somebody else s blood into it after they poured blood to a-41 and the t-shirt. much like when teenagers drink their parents alcohol in order to conceal that, they have to fill the bottle back up with something else. cooper and his team eventually brought their claims of blood tampering to judge marilyn hough requesting that daniel gregonas be called to testify but as in previous petitions, judge hough denied all of their requests. after more than 20 years on death row and numerous failed appeals, the course now set kevin cooper s execution date for february 10th, 2004. by this time, news of the controversy surrounding kevin s case had become widespread.
lab technician daniel gregonas had access to. they would strengthen that assertion by taking the vial to an independent lab for analysis. it was discovered that the vial of kevin cooper s blood contained two different blood types and two different dna types indicating without any doubt that additional blood from another person had been poured into cooper s vial. the likelihood is that they poured somebody else s blood into it after they poured blood on to a-41 and the t-shirt. much like when teenagers drink their parents alcohol in order to conceal that, they have to fill the bottle back up with something else. cooper and his team eventually brought their claims of blood tampering to judge marilyn hough requesting that daniel gregonas be called to testify but as in previous petitions, judge hough denied all of their requests.
prosecution didn t do it, then they have committed what is called a brady violation and the trial must be reversed and a new trial given. tennis shoe situation. the blue shirt and the bloody cover alls were all brady violations and we put on evidence as to all of those. judge hough rejected it. kevin cooper was running out of time, so his defense team reached out to a new potential advocate. san francisco chronicle columnist debra saunders. as a supporter of the death penalty, i wouldn t want to see an innocent man executed, would i? so if there s a hint that somebody is not guilty be executed, i want to know about it. i want to write about it. my editorial board at the san francisco chronicle wrote an editorial saying, gee, maybe kevin cooper is an innocent man.
types indicating without any doubt that additional blood from another person had been poured into the cooper s vile. the likelihood is that they poured somebody else s blood into it after they poured blood on to a-41 and the t-shirt. much like when teenagers drink their parents alcohol in order to conceal that, they have to fill the bottle back up with something else. cooper and his team eventually brought their claims of blood tampering to judge marilyn hough requesting that daniel gregonas be called to testify but as in previous petitions, judge hough denied all of their requests. after more than 20 years on death row and numerous failed appeals, the course now set execution date for february 10th, 2004. by this time, news of the
he was a convicted murderer. he had strangled to death a young woman and thrown her body into a canal. san bernardino police waited 11 months before questioning lee furrow and when they did, they never asked him about his missing axe. they seemed to accept that he didn t own any overalls. tom parker thinks he knows why. the cover alls had been destroyed. deputy took them in to get rid of them because it was unfounded they were connected to the case. of course, there had never been any blood testing or whatever to come to that conclusion. heil now raised the destruction of evidence with judge hough. in a criminal prosecution, the prosecution is required to turn over to the defense any evidence that might be considered exonerating. it s a rule that if the