which were nothing short of sensational almost on a weekly basis that he knew absolutely zero? i think that it is possible for the following reasons. number one, when piers morgan was in charge of the news of the world i remember i was still living in england, so that is a very long time ago, because i moved to america in 1997. and i think that in the old days when, you know, you have to remember that rupert broke the print unions in britain in the 1980s and a great ally of margaret thatcher s and is a way the man responsible for the very competitive british press which is unique to britain. i mean, it doesn t exist in any other country in the world, and i think that in the early days, he was much more hand s on on it, and he did used to call the
any time in history with israel. he must not read the same papers i do. he says that the prime minister and the president and their place tomorrow is anywhere but their seats in the capital. as far as security goes the president is clearly negotiating a deal with iran where they are working to cut a deal to cut a deal. the prime minister stated he is not against a deal but just against a bad deal. i would say that about the vice president out of town at the inauguration. the obama administration, the president didn t go near nor the secretary of state to margaret thatcher s funeral. i think it is fair to say that is a phony trip. democrats say they won t go. why? maybe there is some kind of loyalty to the president.