for literally five plus years already. maria: we re looking at the timeline, your suit, page v. comey, u.s. v. can chen eco, and we see danchenko, and we see then up sealing of that. and that is when we learned that igor danchenko was actually on the payroll of the fbi. so why was the fbi paying danchenko from march of 2017 all the way until october 2020, and why do you believe that information could be a game-changer to overturn the dismissal of your lawsuit? maria, because it represents complete fraud, and it also represents, you know, there s been a lot of prosecution in terms of lying to congress, lying to the federal government. unfortunately, this is exactly what doj and other operatives in washington have been doing for years in terms of part of this cover-up. if so this is so this is finally, you know, unfortunately for both the judge in my case and, you know, the credibility
many in florida some of farmers and growers say why are you shipping these immigrants up north? we need them to pick the crops down c here. maria: coming up, nevada senate candidate adam laxalt on the dangerous cartels in charge of the southern border and his senate race in nevada. willte r it be chincher for thep to take senate control? plus, breaking news morning as the walls close in on the fbi over alleged political bias. fbi his whenning blowers go to congress and allegedly face retaliation. while former trump campaign adviser carter page wants to know why the fbi had igor danchenko on the payroll from march of 2017 to october 2020.n his new motion this morning to overturn thi the dismissal of hs lawsuimit today in this exclusi. it s all right here, right nowe, on sunday morning futures.
the primary source was actually a democrat operative tied to hillary clinton. we now know that the fbi was paying danchenko from march of 2017 to october of 2020. he was on their payroll. joining me right now this morning with this breaking muse is the former trump campaign adviser himself, carter page. carter, thanks very much for being here. you have had an incredible several years. give us your sense of this new motion that you have filed indicating this new information. you have filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment which was filed this weekend in the fisa abuse case in d.c. maria, listen, it is the same fight that all of the members of, the republican members of congress, the trump administration and million of americans across the country have been asking for and fighting over the last five plus years. all we want is the truth. unfortunately, i was litigating my fisa abuse case which
the odds of them talking are very slim. in my own experience y can tell you in a pretty similar situation in march of 2017, when president trump told the world that the fbi had been listening to his phone calls in trump tower, which was not true, a complete falsehood, we went to the justice department and asked them, hey, you need to make a public statement to make it clear we didn t do this, and doj said sorry, we don t comment on confirming or denying these sorts of facts. so it would not surprise me at all if doj maintains their silence on this issue. all right, thank you very much, director mccabe. i appreciate your time. sand i want to go to our panel. kaitlan collins who covered the trump presidency. elie honig, our senior legal analyst and former assistant u.s. attorney in the southern district of new york, and david irvin, former trump campaign senior adviser. david, when you hear director mccabe lay this out, he thinks
it was truthable. possibly curable, and then about a month later in 2017, in march of 2017, he developed other symptoms not consistent with the autoimmune disease, and it was determined that he had stage four lung cancer and a very rare form because he did not have a primary tumor, so he was given six to eight weeks to live in march. however, they did find a a treatment that worked, an immunotherapy treatment that did work, and they extended his life for three years, and he died on may 6th of 2020. yeah. and, i mean, i am so sorry. i mean, the thing is, that you know, your son-in-law did what those members of congress for the most part didn t have the courage to do. it s easy for them to sit back and say no to something that