and prayed, barack obama and sat with the widow of caesar chavez. yes, we can, coming from the chavez movement. it might be an opportunity to bring the latino movement into the fold and have a talk about the poverty situation, that no one should be afraid of a midnight knock on the door. there s a lot of opportunity for the president. again, reread the second inaugural and i think this will almost be a component speech to the social justice part of what i thought was an excellent second inaugural. you know, it will be interesting to see how he ties the issues together. finally, james, i want to get to something i found interesting from the washington post. they issued a mea culpa, turning out the post missed a lot of things in their coverage in 1963. they were forthcoming about this. the front page lead story in 1963 about the march didn t mention martin luther king jr. or his speech. the words i have a dream appeared once on a-15 in the
they are 99% of them are civilians. they are women. they are children. they are old people. they re not fighters. they re not soldiers. they re just people who want a change of government. they actually can t do much to defend themselves. they can t even get out of the way of the firing. and they are continuing to be that s why at the end, one particular brave individual managed to get us out under fire and it was so important for them to know that we were going to be able to broadcast the pictures to the world. because as far as gadhafi is concerned, the march didn t happen. there aren t tens of thousands
they actually can t do much to defend themselves. they can t even get out of the way of the firing. and they are continuing to be that s why at the end, one particular brave individual managed to get us out under fire and it was so important for them to know that we were going to be able to broadcast the pictures to the world. because as far as gadhafi is concerned, the march didn t happen. there aren t tens of thousands of people in zawia who are critical of gadhafi and they aren t being shelled and they aren t being killed. if we happen to actually have the support of these courageous
they are children. they are old people. they re not fighters. they re not soldiers. they re just people who want a change of government. they actually can t do much to defend themselves. they can t even get out of the way of the firing. and they are continuing to be that s why at the end, one particular brave individual managed to get us out under fire and it was so important for them to know that we were going to be able to broadcast the pictures to the world. because as far as gadhafi is concerned, the march didn t happen. there aren t tens of thousands
governments will definitely draw their own conclusions. fouad, i get a lot of e-mails from people saying why does the u.s. have to be the only ones doing this, why can t the other arab states be involved? you ask a legitimate question about the arabs. in a perfect world where the arabs are responsible for themselves, there would be an arab rescue effort. there is no arab rescue effort conceivable. we asked about bosnia. why did we have to go to the rescue when it was the backyard of europe? why didn t the europeans do it? it ended up with america having to do the heavy lifting. it s the burden of power. it s the burden of being the pre-eminent power in the world. it s the burden of being the moral power of the world. we can t watch this slaughter. all we are doing when we delay coming to the rescue is we just