decision, something we ve seen in the mar-a-lago prosecution is the single-minded desire to get the trial fast. that means that they needed a streamlined case and a simple case. but the contrary principle here will be holding those who are the most responsible for what the country has been through accountable, and that means we are likely to see some of these folks, if they re not cooperating, show up this defense. okay so glenn, i have the order from judge aileen cannon, saying the mar-a-lago documents case for trial in may of 20, four for our viewers to understand context, the business fraud case brought by new york a.g. laetitia james october 2nd 2023 trial. casey e. jean carroll s civil trial january 2024. another civil case pop by roberta kaplan for a pyramid scheme, prompted january 29 2024. alvin bragg, manhattan d.a. case, separate trial, march 25th 2024. i mean, putting aside the crime,
to know that you can get arrested and sent to prison for a long time by being a little too fanatical for donald trump. so, i am personally am expecting no violent fanaticism by trump supporters tomorrow, just like we saw no violent fanaticism by trump supporters the last time donald trump was arraigned as a criminal defendant in manhattan. the only experienced criminal defense lawyer, we know donald trump will have at aside tomorrow s todd blanche, a former federal prosecutor who has been representing donald trump as a criminal defendant in manhattan in the criminal case accusing donald trump of falsifying business records, paying hush money to porn star stormy downhills. that case already has a trial date of march 25th, 2024. the new york times is reporting that it was simply the luck of the draw, the judicial selection process, that assigned jack smith federal invite indictment of trump, to the single most pro trump judge in america that we know about,
too fanatical for donald trump. so, i am personally am expecting no violent fanaticism by trump supporters tomorrow, just like we saw no violent fanaticism by trump supporters the last time donald trump was arraigned as a criminal defendant in manhattan. the only experienced criminal defense lawyer, we know donald trump will have at aside tomorrow s todd blanche, a former federal prosecutor who has been representing donald trump as a criminal defendant in manhattan in the criminal case accusing donald trump of falsifying business records, paying hush money to porn star stormy daniels. that case already has a trial date of march 25th, 2024. the new york times is reporting that it was simply the luck of the draw, the random judicial selection process, that assigned jack smith federal invite indictment of trump, to the single most pro trump judge in america that we know about,
a trial date is set for donald trump. march 25th, 2024. in other words, right the middle of a presidential primary season. trump will trade the campaign trail for a new york courtroom to stand trial in the stormy daniels hush-money case. in court today, the judge made sure that the former president knew the rules about what he can and cannot say. whether he s standing on a campaign trail stage or sitting in front of a tv camera, a decision trump is already saying violates his free speech and calling election interference. and joining the table is one of trump s attorneys and the first impeachment trial, robert ray, the former head of the office of independent counsel. maggie, i want to start with the timing here because this is very significant. we knew that this could land smack dab the middle of the next presidential campaign.
today, he made a virtual appearance at a hearing in the manhattan d.a. s hush money case. it was his first court appearance since pleading not guilty to 34 counts of falsifying business records. this afternoon, the judge told him the trial would begin on march 25th 2024, the heart of the presidential campaign season. the judge also issued an order of restricting trump opposing about some evidence in the case, nbc legal analyst lisa reuben was in the courtroom. the judge did not obey the protective order to trump line for line, but definitely wanted to make sure on the record that trump had reviewed it line for line with his lawyer and that he understood most importantly that it is a court order that if he violates, he risks a wide range of sanctions including and up through criminal contempt. was my clinic believes this is an infringement of a first amendment right and i have assured him, your honor, that