tonight. roger stone will join us with more on these predawnodayay raids in this case at his home with fake news. cnn cameras. how do they get tipped off along with the very latest details from america s partisan two tiered system of justice. butca tonight we begin with a fx news alert breaking right now. one individual with access to the fbi search warrant used at mar a lago is revealing new details to the show tonightb about thatou document. w and tonight we can exclusively report that the warrant identify two very vague categories of interest. one , documents that should or could be in the national archivesaid to anything else tha might be marked classified. it was actually thatrk general. now, mr. garland, let s see the affidavit that you presented to the trump hating , epa loving jeffrey epstein friends, defender, magistrate, becausest the list of whatva they took was kind of also vague and meaningless. so the affidavit, what you did to get this warrant, you took respons
in some article three judge to basically confirm that this is the correct course of action. but we re going to have to see that affidavit now. we don t know. they may found classified information. the government has a right to retrieve that information. t but it s also important to note that this is a fairly commonn conflict between former presidents and the archives material is taken all the time that the archives says thatk. that needs to be brought back . even furniture has been taken out of the white house. to formert belong presidents. and so this is not i uncommon. and if they found those types of documents, the questionin still remains, why couldn t you have done that with a less intrusive means? the attorney general today said? theretorn was no other possibler less intrusive means. that sus left a lot of us scratching our heads. i , i can think of a lot ofna alternatives and this warrant hopefully will explain why you
donald trump was complying with federal officials prior tot the raido and he already handed over multiple boxes, as many as 15 and as of june 3rd, the fbi and doj, they were at mar a lago. at the national archives noted hisd cooperation and a statement back in februaryd, the former president met with these federal officials from the doj and other agencies in june. he showed them the rest of the documents. they asked them to putk a padlock on the door, securing the documents at their request . and he also said come back for whatever you need, any time you need to because his last name is donald trump. not biden, not obama, not clinton, not hunter. itcl just t wasn t enough. so the fbi, when judgege shopping, they found the perfect guy compromised obama donor, trump hater on social media to rubberstampmp their absurd warrant and then rolled up at mar a lago inforce. and now according tomp tnt my sources, despite demands from the fbi to turneses all the security cameras at
don t comply. so what do you do? you t either issue a new subpoet or you do a motion to compel. why wasn t i done in this case?e the people were working well with them. whyywell wasn t that done? that sn a question for merrick garland. number two fornd eric garland, t the warrant. think t about the warrant if w you re going to issue a warrant, the reason has to be i m worriede they re going to destroy evidence. well, what suspect about that? we venc now learned that warrant was signed on friday, but not executed until monday. so why get the warrant that doesn t even make sense. number. three , i have personally been involved in many, many search warrants authorizing them, the execution of the search warrants and they came in there with guns blazing, like you said, for documents. you know what you do?u go up you get a couple of agents. you go up, you show a warrant, mar a lago.o. they knew the president wasn t-a there. they knew it was a skeleton
that has a documented history of false statements, a documented history of misleading courts. t and you have to consider that before you approve a raid of this kind. and onee of the things that struck me with your initial comments, john , c with thesey sources is how they described this war. they they told you that there were two things described in the warrant. one ,an a general category of material that should have been turned over to the archives under the presidential records act. and the secondec one was a general reference to possibly classifiedla information. if that description is accurate, it is very concerning. first of all, the first categorya fi i think you have to just set aside, it is not a criminal statute. it s not ordinarily enforced using thesest types of heavyac handed tactics. what all of us were looking for in this warrant and maybe we ll see it is a w specificityi