with their high-powered rifles to protect you? here s the response from his office. quote, we don t comment on that as related to the prime minister of security. so in other words the people in power get to keep the guns, people lose theirs. in this country, unlike canada, we have a second amendment, you d like to think that you would be protected with your second amendment from your guns and be able to have a gun. politicians who want to suspend your civil liberties while you have a second amendment wouldn t be able to do, but the bill of rights is just words on a paper without a government that cares about protecting your rights. you lose your rights and that s what s happening right now. this week, jay insley, governor of washington still, signed a law banning semiautomatic rifles when which he called assault weapons. watch how he justified the massive move. there is no reason for their use in the state of washington. no one needs an ar-15 to protect your family. the you
i mean, the types of arms they re talking about going after are involved in the fewest number of homicides annually, and have been since these numbers have been tabulated. it also gives them a pass to ignore the real problem, brian. you have weak das in my hometown of st. louis, the mayor of st. louis was just going off about firearms and firearm law. the problem is st. louis, that s kim gardner land, weak da land. she s the worst. that s weak penalties, playing politics with prosecutions, and innocent people suffer. the response shouldn t be to disarm law-abiding innocent people. right. it should be to enforce the deterrents and prosecute the offenders. that s not what s being done in washington or anywhere else. one thing they re doing, they got to ban assault weapons, mandate safety training, 10-day waiting periods. this is what s really scary, a bill creating a liability for firearm manufacturers. so if i go grab a gun, whoever made and i do something unsavory and bre