Normally storage does not require windows of this kind. Storage does not require doors going downstairs into the garden and coming in from the breezeway i think this is somewhat unusual and i would like to ask staff as to whether or not that was discussed, considered, or was the applicant asked on what the Storage Space already entails. The option would be to not have this wall dividing the storage area. You could have a three car tandem garage, although that is not very feasible for moving cars around. And a. D. U. Would trigger new requirements under the Building Code, which might make this project unfeasible for the applicants. There is a narrow lot. They would have additional egress requirements. When this project started, i believe in a. D. U. Was not possible until you would need at least three years to add it, so at the time it could have been added with thought for the future, but i believe the staff and the project architects can speak more directly on the requirements under t
And i would like to ask staff as to whether or not that was discussed, considered, or was the applicant asked on what the Storage Space already entails. The option would be to not have this wall dividing the storage area. You could have a three car tandem garage, although that is not very feasible for moving cars around. And a. D. U. Would trigger new requirements under the Building Code, which might make this project unfeasible for the applicants. There is a narrow lot. They would have additional egress requirements. When this project started, i believe in a. D. U. Was not possible until you would need at least three years to add it, so at the time it could have been added with thought for the future, but i believe the staff and the project architects can speak more directly on the requirements under the Building Code because they did investigate this. So if no one else has questions, i do have questions about the existing tenant and i do not see anything in the packet. I see that her
Believe in a. D. U. Was not possible until you would need at least three years to add it, so at the time it could have been added with thought for the future, but i believe the staff and the project architects can speak more directly on the requirements under the Building Code because they did investigate this. So if no one else has questions, i do have questions about the existing tenant and i do not see anything in the packet. I see that her lease his lease goes to august is there an agreement that she is coming back, or has she put anything in riding that she is no longer a tenant . I would like i dont want a permit that we are, you know, approving to be causing the eviction of a tenant. Absolutely. That is not the intention. I am 56 years old and named julio. I was born and raised in that neighborhood. The idea is to enhance it and not do anything to detract from it. Specific to your question, the property sat vacant for about a year and recently, in september, we wanted it out to
Preservation staff and the existing building was determined not to be a historic resource. The replacement building will contain two modest sized 1200 square foot flats with a two car tandem garage. The building will extend to the 45 per the project sponsor brief, the Property Owners originally investigated modifying the existing buildings but found that option to be unfeasible. Currently the home is tenant occupied and there is no history of evictions at this site as reported by the rent board. Department received greek Public Comments after the commission packets were distributed and one letter is from a neighbor who is opposed to the project because it removes naturally Affordable Housing stock. The other letters are from adjacent neighbors who are concerned about the mapping of the threestory building and loss of light and air. I would like to read a correction into the record. Page six of the draft motion contains an error. It refers to the new building as owneroccupied. Both unit
Second. Thank you. On that motion to continue this matter to december 2nd december 5th. Excuse me, december 5th. [roll call] assistant Zoning Administrator . Continuing the variance to the same date. Thank you. That will place us in item 18 , 3360 sacramento street, conditional use authorization. Good afternoon, commissioners i am with Planning Department staff. The proposal before you as a conditional use authorization to legally establish a trade office to doing businesses the devonian group within the sacramento street m. C. D. The planning code requires conditional use authorization for trade office uses within this zoning district. The subject property is developed with a threestory, mixed use building, constructed in 1909. No exterior modifications other than business signage are proposed. The ground floor tenant space has been occupied by the existing tenant since january, 2013. Prior to 2013, the space was used as an office for a design professional. The project is zoning and h