Frontier Communication’s headquarters on the Kanawha River in Charleston. (Photo by Steven Allen Adams)
CHARLESTON West Virginia became the 12th state to accept the bankruptcy reorganization plan from Frontier Communications, even though lawmakers still have concerns whether Frontier can live up to its promises to expand broadband service across the state.
The state Public Service Commission released two orders Friday: one accepting a proposed settlement agreement between Frontier, PSC attorneys, the PSC’s Consumer Advocate Division and the Communication Workers of America union and the other accepting the results from a long-anticipated focused management audit of the company.
The two orders impose strict conditions on Frontier to improve its copper-line phone and internet services, as well as expand its fiber broadband internet service. Under the joint stipulation agreement approved by the PSC, Frontier agreed to spend $200 million on capital improvements by Dec. 31, 2023,
Frontier Communication’s headquarters on the Kanawha River in Charleston. (Photo by Steven Allen Adams)
West Virginia became the 12th state to accept the bankruptcy reorganization plan from Frontier Communications, even though lawmakers still have concerns whether Frontier can live up to its promises to expand broadband service across the state.
The state Public Service Commission released two orders Friday: one accepting a proposed settlement agreement between Frontier, PSC attorneys, the PSC’s Consumer Advocate Division and the Communication Workers of America union and the other accepting the results from a long-anticipated focused management audit of the company.
The two orders impose strict conditions on Frontier to improve its copper-line phone and internet services, as well as expand its fiber broadband internet service. Under the joint stipulation agreement approved by the PSC, Frontier agreed to spend $200 million on capital improvements by Dec. 31, 2023, and to deplo
constitutional enforcement of the law. i know you have said that you believe that the doj investigation may not be enough in baltimore. you believe baltimore needs a management audit. explain the difference. management audit should be conducted by some subject matters experts in policing top to bottom review of the operations administration of the police department because that s how they re going to get better. the doj civil rights pattern or practice investigation is just that it s an investigation. it s going to help them correct the constitutional misconduct that s going on in the department but a hgmentmanagement audit united states a way to look at entire agency and try to get better. if the baltimore police department is found to have systemic issues through the doj investigation, what would you expect to happen besides laying out a set of corrections.