Im just going say no. Breed no. Supervisor campos . No. Campos no. Supervisor cohen . Aye. Cohen aye. Thank you. Supervisor kim . Kim no. Supervisor mar . No. Mar no. Supervisor peskin. Peskin no. Supervisor tang . Aye. Tang aye. Supervisor wiener . Aye. Wiener aye. Supervisor yee . No. Yee no. Supervisor avalos . No. Avalos no there are three ayes and seven nos with supervisors breed, campos, kim, mar, peskin, yee and avalos in the dissent. Okay the amendment fails [ gavel ]. Madam clerk, what was the second . The second motion made by supervisor wiener, seconded by supervisor cohen on page 3 line 3. I believe supervisor wiener after property statewide except for parks and open space. Except for parks and yes. Okay. Okay, im sorry, i need to pull up the resolution to understand that specifically. Okay. Madam president , i think we can take that without objection. Okay. Colleagues can we take that amendment without objection, without objection the amendment passes. [ gavel ] and on ite
We recognize, we cant do it alone. This goes to the staffing issues. Theres going to be in National Guard component. Theres going to be another sector component to it. The dhs component to it. A Law Enforcement component so bringing the whole Community Together for response to Cyber Threats is a great lesson out of the ukraine. Two things i wanted to put a fine point on. One, the physical cyber convergence, the attack surface growing exponentially. When we Start Talking about the internet of things and the internet of everything, making security into the design of architecture becomes that much more important. Secure coding and the like. And i might note that one of the greatest deterrence and ive been an outspoken critic that we havent really articulated a cyber deterrence strategy and i think we in essence blame the victim. We blame entities rather than penalize and put pain and cost on the perpetrator but thats a longer conversation but maybe one of the best deterrence is the abilit
Measures, so forth. Theyre talking about the i work for childrens massive implications that they National Health system. See happening. And im wondering if the panel this question is addressed to has any thoughts on this. Dr. Fullman. You mentioned population as one of the things you would have to thanks. Face eventually down the road, double or tripling. Thank you for your question. Has the institute you work with, as i mentioned in my first has it partnered with any Asean Department of health agencies, remarks, aec, asean economic regional, national or local level, with the hope to reduce community, the group asean is the number of consumers and the demand for Energy Consumption . Really influential and very relevant to u. S. Business economies. And so is for all Japanese Business communities. And a you know, the Japanese Companies has made tons of thank you very much. Its very hard for me to address investment, Foreign Direct Investment in asean countries for many, many years in the
Clancys the right person to get us there. Well he didnt know about this for five days. Thats true. It happened on wednesday which meant i didnt know about it for five days plus. And found out he said through an email. Instead of up the chain of command. That concerns me a lot that the agency needs discipline, and it needs an outsider in some position there to be sure that were not jeopardizing the president s life, by taking care of people who have been our friends for years within the service. And that smacks to me that that may have happened on the latest incident. So mr. Secretary were looking to you to bring that agency in to conformity with the high standards with which its been associated with all these years. We must discipline that agency and make it work like its supposed to. The importance of the job they have, to protect the life of the president of the United States among other things demands remedy. Thank you. I couldnt agree more, sir. Thank you, mr. Chairman. We have six
Legislative power that is addressed in article section 1 from the election of senators in article 1 section 3. And again in smiley that made clear that the meaning, as this court reiterated just last week in yates, that the meaning of a term in an enactment may differ depending on the function that the term is serving. Now youre going to the statute. But just under the constitution youre saying the legislature in the first article of section 3, the now repealed section that talks about choosing senators means Something Different than it means in the following section. As this court explained in smith versus hawk, which was an article 5 question of the meaning of the word legislature for purposes of ratification. In smith versus hawk, this court said that in the article 1 section 3 election of senators by the legislature and in article 5 the ratification power, what was at issue was a power that is the power to elect and the power to ratify that specifically comported with the elected r