Act a year or so ago. Tell us how that impacted all and what that means for every one here. Sure. The pregnancy discrimination act is a part of title vii of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Congress passed the pregnancy discrimination act in 1973 after a Supreme Court ruling, and last year, about a year and half of those a case before the Supreme Court, young versus ups, and in that case peggy young had been working for ups. She had a normal pregnancy. So there was, she had no reticular medical issues with her pregnancy particular. Her doctor recommended that she can later in the pregnancy, not live more than 20 pounds. 20 pounds. Which if youre a driver for ups, you can imagine that might be a problem. She asked for an accommodation for light duty, gps said we dont give accommodations for people who have anything other than an on the job injury. So this is your only option is to not work, and you can come back after your pregnancy but thats your only option. So she sued under the pregnan
We begin with new developments in wednesdays shooting rampage in San Bernardino, california. An isis Radio Station announcing the two shooters were supporters of the terrorist group. Tashfeen malik and her husband, sayed Rizwan Farouk killed 14 people and wounded 21 others by opening fire at the Regional Center. They both died in a Police Shootout. An official close to the investigation telling cnn that the female attacker, posted on pace book pledging allegiance to abu ab dar al baghdadi. They are investigating as an act of terrorism. Lets get to paul san ddoval. What more did we learn about the package addressed to the shooters home . Reporter it did turn out to be a false alarm. It was enough to leave many on edge. Three days since the shooting. This story is still heavy on the minds of people. It is all over the local headlines. The reminders were right there. San bernardino on edge. Overnight, police evacuated a ups facility and called in the bomb squad to investigate a package. I
going on. [cheers and applause] we have no choice. we have no choice. we can t live like this. it will get worse and worse. you will have more world trade centers. it s going to get worse and worse. we knowledge be politically correct and stupid but it will get worse and worse. bill: there was wired spread condemn there was widespread condemnation from both side of the aisle. here is vice president dick cheney. he thinks it s a terrible idea. this idea of no more muslims, to ban a religion is a bad idea. bill: let s bring in byron york. if history is any guide, this is going to play out like it has for the past year. how s that? it s not the first controversy involving donald trump. there are recognizable steps in these trump controversies. the first is there is a problem. then trump comes up with a radical proposal. in this case a ban on all muslims entering the country. it sets the political world on fire. his rival candidate condemn him, the political establishment
it s 3:00 on the east coast. noon on the west coast. and donald trump is getting dumped on from all sides from sea to shining sea after he unveiled his plan to ban all muslims from coming into our nation. donald j. trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of muslims entering the united states until our country s representatives can figure out what the hell is going on. we can t live like this. it s going to get worse and worse. you ll have more world trade centers. it s going to get worse and worse, folks. we can be politically correct and we can be stupid. but it s going to get worse and worse. donald trump says he thinks it is the best way to stop another 9/11 style attack. of course he can t do any of what he just said. that s unamerican constitutionally. our leaders insist it would be counterproductive sending exactly the wrong message to one-fourth of the world s population. yet today he said he would also consider closing the internet up in some way to kee
its own security. it is true that written sharing is that burden-sharing is a two-way street in connection with nato post up this is with nato. this is an age old question that predates the fall of the berlin wall. many years later, when i note is that, despite it all, nothing major has changed. as things stand, the u.s. is clearly setting its sights, its strategic sites on the pacific. i had just come back from india. i could sum up political sentiment in india on europe by saying the following india believes in the u.s., believes in major states, but not in the european union. i am summarizing, simplify, but that is more or less the message. there are threats facing us, surrounding us. they are > every even if of the opinion is not aware of this. look at what is happening in syria. of course, we do not wish to see a military intervention there, but it might be necessary if certain forces lay their hands on chemical weapons. so it would be interesting to hear your asse