That should be a principle of you and the principle that the Prime Minister reiterated in Prime Ministers questions today. I would have hoped that would have been a principle that could have been held by everybody across all parties in this house of commons. Certainly as far as im concerned, as far as the conservative party is concerned our manifesto would make it clear well introduce legislation needed to restore our declining Communications Capability and well use all the legal powers available to us to make sure where appropriate the police and security and intelligence agencies have the maximum ability to intercept the communications of suspects while insuring that such intrusive techniques are of course properly overseen. Mr. Peter hayes. Of course the secure Services Must have the necessary tools for the job but does she accept the priority is speak up, stand up against and where necessary confront islamophobia, antisemitism, racism and the fascist groups like the bnt and their d
We developed a preliminary set of risk indicators to analyze elements of risk along our border and evaluate the progress we were making amin relation to our goals. Before 2012 if you asked a Border Patrol agent if we were winning, he would say absolutely, and he would point to the number of arrests and seizures to show you that. Regardless of whether they went up or down, we were winning. We had no other way to explain it. This isnt to suggest we werent seceding in our mission, we just had no way to tell if we were succeeding along our border. So the Border Patrol had to build a foundation of consistent and reliable data on crossborder occurrences. Not only on data of what we were catching, we also had to record data on what we were not catching and the unknown. Today the Border Patrol does not describe the border as controlled or uncontrolled. Instead it uses a variety of indicators, intelligence estimates, capability assessments, commander judgment to assign areas with risk category
While i was thinking, speaking, and thank you very much for listening, during that time, the rosetta spacecraft has continued to circle the dark icy object that is, 67 p. Comet 67 p. And we may yet learn more of its secrets as it gets closer to the sun. Look at the mission that put together that unbelievable success. They were diverse. They came from different horizons. They did not grow up together. I think diversity had something to do with the success of that rosetta mission, and it is certainly a true testament to global cooperation. And policymakers should be inspired by that. You know, the real secret when we i found rosetta a long time ago, what can engender growth, but to deliver on the three rosetta moments as i call them policymakers need to enhance cooperation. They need to enhance a new multilateralism, and they need to put it into practice. Whether it applies toclop, ttp ttip, seg are you with me . It also requires new institutions that are efficient and credible and worki
This crazy market in perspective. Call me at 1800743cnbc or tweet me at jim cramer. Does the market know what its doing . Does it really punish apple stock for, lets call it as it is, the best quarter ever. Does it really reward murick for not screwing up . Should twitter have been crushed on an estimate cut or ibm rally on a dividend hike . One is still growing like a weed and the other is not growing at all. These are all part of the mosaic today. S p gained. 28 but the nasdaq fell. 10 . Its not that the market is stupid or even that its unreasonable. Its just that its prone periodically to brain freezes and snap judgments. We saw a huge number of snap judgments today and they may not hold up under close scrutiny. Even as they seem dramatic and final in their severity. First theres apple. What happened . How could this stock be down if youre selling more than 60 billion iphone. How could it be down with the excitement of the watch . How could it be down with the rapid adoption of app
[laughter] thanks, i appreciate your comments. And i am intrigued by those that you wrapped up within the decision they can process for the preparedness and the allocation of resources and you find it completely ad hoc and disjointed and one response to that is democracy. It is a messy process with the location resources done by things allocated by criteria that might not always be rational. That is the reality of the democracy and the testing of the responsibility and the political executive branch. You mentioned in terms of how to fix it in rationalizing the democracy i think that we could agree you suggested this Public Health czar or official. Any other specific ideas to lead from the federal level on how we can make that process a little bit more rational and Going Forward . Well, i guess i would start at the top. I think the president staff and the cabinet have to come to some agreement about instructor for the decisionmaking that becomes increasingly more inclusive. And it gets