publication. in this particular instance, it will be hard to get teeth in this lawsuit even if ray lewis wants to file one whether it s against sports sports illustrated.com or against ross because you need to show there was malice disregard for the truth. there s a bit of gray area with regard to what the actual bottom line is here. ray lewis is saying he never took it. mitch ross is saying he never told sports illustrated is saying he did take it. i don t know. i think this whole thing is a lot of fairy dust and not a lot of evidence. it s just bizarre. gregg: you know, jim look. in the aftermath of the you know cycling drug stories involved a lot of people including you know, the sports figures, you know, in football what do you make of this? well i think the credibility because of lance armstrong but the credibility of ray lewis is still subject to question