his plan, to prevent house managers from calling witnesses to prove their case is a dramatic break from precedent. we heard a lot about precedent from the leader. never has there been a presidential impeachment trial in which the majority prevented the house managers from fairly presenting their case, to have witnesses explain their knowledge of the alleged malfeasan malfeasance. will leader mcconnell break press tecedent to make this thet impeachment trial in senate history that heard no, no witnesses. we ask, is the president s case so weak that none of the president s men can defend him under oath. is the president s case so weak that none of the president s men can defend him under oath.
incident of one person, not an incident of two people, it is just a systemic failing. the constitution says that if you have neglect of duty, malfeasan malfeasance, misfeasance or incompetent, we have the right to ask the governor to remove you from office and he swore on all four points. watch any of the interviews from day one to day 12, and he s got more people under investigation in his own office than he does trying to track down and put to the death penalty a massive mass murderer and so what we re saying is enough is enough. let s get someone in there, i applaud governor scott, he s got our fdla agents from tallahassee that goes down, they ll start investigating and figuring out what is going on down there, they can t do it themselves. there are those who look at this and say, look, this is political. what is happening here is an attempt to distract from the debate on guns. is that fair? no, it is completely unfair. let s walk through it. all you have to do is watch any of t
hearings will be intense. i m waiting for daryl issa to subpoena my hard drive of the republicans are calling this on the level, suggesting this may be conspiracy on the level of the watergate tapes and this is some sort of partisan, stone walling, nobody has yet tackled the theory that it might just be government bureaucracy and underfunded department and agents who don t really know how to interpret the law or perhaps a law regarding 501 c4s that is too broad. i think we need to separate two things out here. i really think this has become a fascinatingly confused and partisan confused for a reason debate. there s a question on the e-mails and her e-mails did disappear in ways that i think should upset people. it looks like at the very least incompetence, there could be malfeasan malfeasance, the e-mail her computer crashed a couple weeks after ten days after congressman
that could happen to them. and also whether the market will ever enforce some discipline on this. whether they re ever going to start to worry that banks are going to be paying out the nose so much for this kind of malfeasan malfeasance, they start to worry as investors. all that when we come right back. of store management started as hourly associates. there s opportunity here. i can use walmart s education benefits to get a degree, maybe work in it, or be an engineer, helping walmart conserve energy. even today, when our store does well, i earn quarterly bonuses. when people look at me, i hope they see someone working their way up. vo: opportunity, that s the real walmart. the blisters were oozing, and painful to touch. i woke up to a blistering on my shoulder. i spent 23 years as a deputy united states marshal and i ve been pretty well banged up but the worst pain i ve experienced was when i had shingles. when i went to the clinic, the nurse told me that it was a result of having ha
but you think there s a reason for people to get upset. i wonder what you think that might be given your second point? the people concerned about conspiracy are upset because this leaves a blank spot unfinished for them. the second point is exactly what you re saying here, there isn t a broader reason to get upset and that is the connection getting missed here. there is an emotional desire to still see something come out of this. a lot of people feel angry about what they feel the irs did, even though no real evidence has come out there was a conspiracy they are worried about. so now that emotion is i think being channelled into this question of lois lerner s e-mail, whatever they say about lois lerner now gone from the irs, they don t prove something larger and there s not webbing between here and there. we have this question coming down to something not actually the question of the conspiracy but people who want to be upset very badly to be upset and go after the irs and obama