that agreement is as clear as ossible. , .. . that agreement is as clear as possible- that agreement is as clear as ossible. , .. . ,., , . possible. joe, what you expect the udue possible. joe, what you expect the judge to possible. joe, what you expect the judge to see possible. joe, what you expect the judge to see any possible. joe, what you expect the judge to see any revised i the judge to see any revised deal? i the judge to see any revised deal? ~ , deal? i think the parties will aet it deal? i think the parties will get it right deal? i think the parties will get it right next deal? i think the parties will get it right next time. - deal? i think the parties will get it right next time. i - deal? i think the parties will| get it right next time. i think they get it right next time. i think they will get it right next time. i think they will get into those details that clearly were not worked details that clearly were not worked out when they walked into court
the weeds and in the seeing the bigger more urgent more pressing picture or task that should be at stake? well, i think there are well intentioned people fighting hard for the things they believe in but i would suggest to all of them that all of the democrats agree we need to do something significant and quick on climate. everyone agrees we have to do something great and big to the infrastructure of roads and bridges and sewer systems aren t serving us well. working class folks need ways to take care of our kids and go to work and create jobs. they agree. making sausage, watching sausage being made is not a wonderful thing but at the end of the day, the rest of the details get lost on the public and the public is getting inpatient and i think people in washington if they heard that yet, need to hear it now. this needs to happen sooner rather than later. pasting deadlines once or twice is okay but after that people
for the things they believe in but i would suggest to all of them that all of the democrats agree we need to do something significant and quick on climate. everyone agrees we have to do something great and big to the infrastructure of roads and bridges and sewer systems aren t serving us well. working class folks need ways to take care of our kids and go to work and create jobs. they agree. making sausage, watching sausage being made is not a wonderful thing but at the end of the day, the rest of the details get lost on the public and the public is getting i mnpatient and i think people in washington if they heard that yet, need to hear it now. this needs to happen sooner rather than later. pasting deadlines once or twice is okay but after that people think what is going on? so i know they re working hard. i know they re well intentioned but at the end of the day they have to get it done sooner rather than later and the president is a leader here and
who say we don t need this investment in our community and in our families. right. i understand the $3.5 trillion reck onciliation bill. that s big. it s important to you. but will you vote no on infrastructure on thursday if there isn t an agreement when it comes to that larger bill? we re getting ready to go to a closed door meeting where we re going to talk about that. i am positioned to demand that we move both at the same time. i understand that there may be some haircuts along the way. that the $3 trillion that we re asking may not be the reality but those programs need to survive. they need to survive so that we can take care of our elderly and our children and the pre-k. so i am one that knows sausage is a very difficult combination of things and that we re in the middle of making sausage. and i want to see what the climate is because i was