that means making money off being first lady. that is not right. and now they have retracted that and said that is not true. so the lawyers have filed a complaint with the judge in new york saying that this complaint needs to be revised. this is the type of controversy we don t need. not a democrat or republican thing. i m a free market republican but i don t think department stores should be bullied into selling merchandise for the president s daughter by the white house and i don t think the white house should be used position of first lady used to market merchandise. there s a free market. that s wonderful. and there s also a government. and the government should be staying out of the business world and stop trying to steer money towards the trump business deals or family or anybody else. and only about 20 years. thanks panel. appreciate it. sorry about the technical
boycottable brands and nordstrom number one because sincere desire to do business with them and since made this announcement, seen flood of love and desire to return to shopping. there s also the lawsuit over a report in a british paper, suit says the report hurt her chance to establish multimillion dollar business relationships during the years she would be quote one of the most photographed women in the world. what is your reaction to the first lady s case here? she has ever right to try to make money on her own but not off being first lady. and the complaint filed in new york state court specifically said that she was going to take advantage of this once in a lifetime opportunity during a multiyear term, we all know what that means, to make a lot of money. that means making money off