that savages the opinion of the conservative majority. maybe you already heard it today, but it s so powerful, the bears repeating. with let them eat cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the report and announces color blindness for all by legal fiat. but deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life. no one benefits from ignorance. although formal race linked legal barriers are gone, restore matters to the lived experiences of all americans in innumerable ways, and today s ruling makes things worse, not better. the best that can be set of the majority s perspective is that it proceeds, offshoots like, from the hope that preventing consideration of race will and racism. but if that is its motivation, the majority proceeds in vain. joining us now, near, former acting solicitor general of the u.s., who has argued 50 cases
better. the best that can be set of the majority s perspective is that it proceeds, offshoots like, from the hope that preventing consideration of race will and racism. but if that is its motivation, the majority proceeds in vain. joining us now, near, former acting solicitor general of the u.s., who has argued 50 cases before the supreme court. he s also a msnbc legal analyst and host of the podcast, courtside with new castillo. neil, thank you for being here. perfect person to ask this question, what are the immediate practical effects of this ruling? so, i ve had a lot of involvement in these cases, so i will speak her personally, not on the behalf of any institutions that i am involved with. i think that is a a decision the, jonathan, is disappointed, but in some ways, it s more narrower than people expected,