let s differentiate two kinds of transparency. he has done more interviews. it has been astonishing to see. he doesn t necessarily always be forthcoming, but he is there. his staffers are engaged with you and talking to people who cover the campaign. that s a good thing. but when it gets to the meat of the matter, when it gets to what are these layers upon layers of llc and corporate holdings, what are mr. trump s taxes, we don t know some of the key things that i think we need to evaluate him. how do you define objectivity in the age of trump? i say this because, trump will have his own version of it. trump has what i call concierge media friends. i m not going to name names here. we know who they are. people that can steer a conversation for him or get rid of it. it s in multiple networks. it s in print publications. how does a mainstream press corps deal with that? harvard kennedy school had a
the matter, when it gets to what are these layers upon layers of llc and corporate holdings, what are mr. ump s taxes, we don t know some of the key things that i think we need to evaluate him. how do you define objectivity in the age of trump? i say this because, trump will have his own version of it. who is fair and who is not. trump has what i call concierge media friends. i m not going to name names here. we know who they are. people that can steer a conversation for him or get rid of it. it s in multiple networks. it s in print publications. how does a mainstream press corps deal with that? harvard kennedy school had a report out last week. they analyze news reports. they found during the election, trump had a 77% negative and clinton had 64%. it was almost the inverse for the full campaign. the point they were making was they both got negative they both had negative press. both negative favorable ratings. exactly. and i think the point there is