consumer protections in wall street s pocket cabinet members over at the consumer bureau like it s a coup d etat telling ms. english she can t do anything and nobody should respond to anything she said. it really is a case where in the end, politics is whose on your side. and clearly this administration over and over it comes to financial rules, they re always on wall street s side every single time. soy understand substantively you re on one side. the president and mick mulvaney, most republicans and most of wall street are on the other about this bureau and what it does. but in a sort of process question in terms of government, it does not seem crazy to me that the president can direct who is going to run essentially a federal agency. well, play it out, though. if the president can put somebody in as an interim director or an interim cabinet member, as an interim anybody like they did at the office of the comptroller of the currency, you bring a total special interest person in w
member, as an interim anybody like they did at the office of the comptroller of the currency, you bring a total special interest person in whose interests are wall street, never main street s, that main street centrist, that person stays in six or eight months. no senate confirmation. i m not a lawyer, but i know the constitution talks about advise and consent. so you can put the special interest people in like nick mulvaney. there are no ethics rules around them because they re interim. so that s what the president can start doing over and over. it s a total violation of what we used to do or what we stand for. but these guys play hardball. look at how he did this today. and that s the way they are going to behave on agency after agency. it s clear. if they win this one, it s katie bar the door. that s what they re going to do. so you met am i correct you met with ms. english today? i did. what was that meeting like and what is her game plan going forward? i really can t tal