Coronavirus at least one ngo an edge is that israel backed by the u. S. And using british weapons is taking advantage of a pandemic to expand settlements illegal under International Law joining me now via skype from haifa in the middle east is historian and author of the ethnic cleansing of palestine professor hanan pappy thank you so much and for coming on you coined the word no more aside this is been a day like no other except where there are reports of an alleged israeli killing of a teenager in the occupied territories record u. K. Arms sales to israel no Public Mobilization remind us of the significance of not by day in the 1st place for palestine and the world. With a commemorates what happened in 148. 00 and all happening only 48. 00 was a crime against humanity that he still denied or not acknowledge even today in that here these are if forces expelled half of palestines book relation the militia type of palestines villages and destroyed most of the palestinian towns it also t
Pleasure to introduce three of americas leading trademark scholars, joining us today to understand the arguments you have just heard. Rebecca is the stanchion professor of the First Harvard Amendment Law school, file filing the brief of trademark scholars in the booking. Com case. Margaret duncan filed a brief in the in support of the respondents in booking. Com and she is the adjunct professor out of the Chicago School of law and she filed a brief on behalf of the intellectual Property Law Association of chicago, where she is vice chair of the amicus committee. Karin is the legal director of the Electronic Frontier foundation, filing a brief in support of the petitioner in booking. Com. Corinne,margaret, thank you to all of you for joining. Thank you. Wonderful. Lets begin with you. Congratulations, your brief was. Ited several times before delving into the but dots in the brief, tell us what this case was about. What were the main legal arguments on both sides . What are the stakes i
Change will be armed by nationalism all the civil war coming up in todays going underground but 1st on wednesdays show we interviewed the chief executive of britains kings fund richard mari he said he believes that failures of the 2012 tory health and social care act have been highlighted by the british response to coronavirus i then asked him this because you were at mckinsey did you see any understanding or consciousness of these kinds of problems ahead of time given that of course it was the gordon brown government that commissioned a mckinsey report that is widely seen as the beginning of the 20th 12 health and social care act i was at the can see long before that so i was back in the department of health by the time of the Gordon Brown Administration so i dont think. The kids he was very influential on the approach taken by Andrew Lansley hed written up his plans many many years before in response to these. Allegations mckinsey and company referred us to this statement which says
Prift with an Inspiring Mission from congress. To december sim nate information about the constitution on a nonpartisan basis to increase awarrens and understanding of the constitution among the american people. Justice holmes once said of the constitution, it is an experiment as all of life is an experiment. The arguments that youve just heard are technical. The kind that law proimples and journalists and citizens often dont listen to closely but we just had the privilege of hearing them live is so our job in the next hour is to unpack them and understand as thoughtfully and as nonpartisan a spirit as possible what the competing arguments are so that ultimately you, cspan watchers and friends from across the country can evaluate the arguments for yourself. I do want you to do some homework after this show, which is to read the briefs in the case. Go to the Supreme Court remember site. Supreme court. Gov. Youll find the briefs on the home page under the name of the case and after our d
Embarked on an exciting educational experiment, we have convened americas leading scholars who have filed griefs on both sides of the case that you just heard as well as a scale that filed a brief on either party to help us understand the oral arguments that we just heard, Justice Holmes once said of the constitution it is an experiment as all of life is an experiment. Youre about to join as an educational experiment, the arguments that you just heard our technical, the kind that law professors and journalists and citizens often dont listen too closely, we just have the privilege of hearing them live so our job in the next hour is to unpack them and understand as thoughtfully and as nonpartisan as possible with the competing arguments are so that ultimately view the people of the United States and cspan watchers and friends can evaluate the arguments themselves. I want to do homework after the show and read the briefs in the case and the best way to understand what we heard was to go t