comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Mackenzie group - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Transcripts For CSPAN2 Key Capitol Hill Hearings 20131211

They would find most effective. Thank you. Thank you, mr. Chairman. Thank you, madam secretary. The chair now recognize the chairman of the full committee for five minutes. Thank you, mr. Chairman. So the goal was to enroll seven americans by the end of march. 365,000 folks in rolled through the end of november. Premiums are due beginning middecember. I wonder, madam secretary, if you could tell us, after christmas somewhere between christmas and new years, as to how many people actually do pay the premium that is due, if you could share that number during the christmas break with us. Would that be possible . Chairman upton, the deadline to enroll is the 23rd. The deadline to pay is the end of the year so we will not have a number until can you let us know that first week as to how many speakers i will let you know as soon as we have the numbers. You indicated to mr. Pallone that, in fact, the launch was flawed. Knowing what you know today, do you wish in fact that you delayed the laun

Transcripts For CSPAN Key Capitol Hill Hearings 20131212

If you do not go through that state exchange, you are not eligible for a subsidy. Irs has ruled that you do not have to obey the law. Subsidiesve you the whether you go through the state exchanges or not. What is the position on obeying the law and doing what the law says, which would mean that almost everybody who signs up for obama care is not eligible for a subsidy because they are not going to be state exchange is . We have deferred to her partners at the Justice Department and that the treasury. What is your position . We have deferred to our partners and litigation and this is in litigation right now. You are not worried about obeying the law . We feel the law covers both date and federal exchanges. That is not what it says. The chair thanks the gentleman. We recognize the gentleman from utah. You have five minutes for questions. Thank you mr. Chairman. Madame secretary, thank you for joining us today. We have art he had one hearing on this website before now, and we are all awar

Transcripts For CSPAN Key Capitol Hill Hearings 20131213

The ones that come in, and if something happens to you and you get in the group that needs more attention but you dont need that much attention. Most americans would balk at that much attention. I dont think its that big a problem, as long as we get the infrastructure. Thanking join me in our panelists for shedding light on areas of consensus when we talk a lot about differences in this town. Thank you very much. [captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2013] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute] good points. Cspan could we bring a Public Affairs events from washington directly to you. Offering complete gavel to gavel coverage of the u. S. House, offered as a Public Service of the private industry. Cspan, created by the cable tv and funded years ago by your local cable or satellite provider. Now you can watch us in hd. The u. S. Senate has approved another of president Barack Obamas nominees as it wraps up a week of near roundtheclock confirmation votes.

Transcripts For CSPAN Key Capitol Hill Hearings 20131212

Do believe in the motivation of what they are doing, but they are zealous and effective. They are in a position where they are able to gather a great deal of information. Interested . E absolutely. No doubt about it. You agree that our government oversight of our National Security establishment is far more interested in protect Civil Liberties . I cannot compare to other people. I do not know the details. I would hope that with our constitution we would have a very effective system. Good faith with the legal structure that allow this surveillance. I do not believe we have lived up to the Core Principles as faithfully as we could, but we do better than the totalitarian regimes, of course. You take a different view. Decisions havee historical positions. There is no present decision by any court that suggests that this is operated in violation of the fourth amendment. There would take a new decision, is that correct . Can you cite the case that supports that proposition . Know, i believe

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.