speak, was to take him by surprise to make sure they could preserve evidence, and that revealed a treasure trove of electronic documents and that s what they will peruse now and there may be evidence there that may contradict stone s bravado posturing at the moments. this tidbit came out i think in the related case filing, and they re really talking about what evidence could be common between some of these cases. but of course, from a ma co lev level, macro level, what is common between the cases is profoundly significant. shan, if they have direct communications between wikileaks and roger stone, and roger stone was, you know, working with part to help the trump campaign, we know wikileaks was working with russia, and disseminating these hacked e-mails, is that a smoking gun, as it pertains to collusion? it is closing in on a smoking gun. but the real smoking gun, we need to know exactly what we