cause for celebration for the vast majority of th americans who agree with the supreme court, who wrote, racialeliminatinge discrimination means eliminating all of it. it cannot mean one thing when applied to one individual and something else when applied to a person of another color. an abc ipsosething poll revealt 52% of americans agree with the decision to race based admissions. but sadly, this did not go over well with many democrats. new york congressman jamaal bowman said the court is illegitimate and that they re there to serve white supremacy and white patriarchy . the supreme court is here to serve oligarchs. oligar they re here to serve billionaires. they re here to servchey re her. they re here to serve white supremacy and white patriarchyr and nativism. they want to take away our civil rights. they want to take away our voting rights, our human s rights. , huma they want to make our country more dangerous by expanding concealen men s ri wand carry p they don t
ging character and their meri t and and not the color of their skin is a cause for n celebration but but in response to chu, former cnn personality soledad o brien tweeted, congrats on screwing over other people of color, ma a ng over m. it s an interesting statement. so many implications. somplicatit mean that if an american asian-american parent who finds that their teenagerin is being discriminated against because of the skin color thatdi they maintain, that they should just shut up and be happy about being allowed into america? or is it instead implication here that asians should feel a sense of solidaritybove a with every other american above an undefined level of melanin? n and if so, this exhibits a level of racism. if that s what this implication is, that anyone above this level of undefined melanin should all stand in solidarity with one another. that s more regressive thane even the thoughts of george wallace. in fact, thi s is morein fac reminiscent of the racist progressi