commissioner funk. one seat on the board currently is vacant and pursuant to charter section 4.1060 the board may hold a meeting when there is a vacancy. in such instances four votes are not required to overrule a departmental action to my left is deputy city attorney robert brian. at the controls is board legal assistant mr. pacheco. we re joined by representatives from the city departments that have cases before the board tonight. dan snyder, representing the planning department and planning commission. patrick o reardon, senior building inspector, we have aliana crusho and janine young from the department of health and mr. harris from the police department. if you could go over the board meeting guidelines and conduct the swearing in process. turn off all phones and pagers. please carry on conversations in the hallway. the board s rules of presentations are as follows. appellants, permit holders each have seven minutes to represent their cases and three minutes for reb
good evening. dan snyder with the planning department. our feeling, commissioners, is that there is no new information at all in this matter, much less information that will be suggestive of a rehearing. the appellant does ask the board to revisit what appear to be five separate issues. what i d like to do is run through those quickly and i ll sit back down again. the first issue is that the appellant continues to allege that the work for this permit was not clearly defined. in fact, the scope remains exactly as it has since prior to your august hearing. this fact is acknowledged on i believe page 2 of the appellant s brief. secondly the appellant alleges there is new work on the site without permit. this allegation appears to stem from a potential misunderstanding, again of information available prior to your august hearing. even if this wasn t the case, work without permit would be subject to a separate code enforcement matter that would be aside from this permit and th