Planning rules in airport flight path âoutdatedâ, expert, councils say
Save
Normal text size
Advertisement
Planning controls in suburbs surrounding Melbourne Airport are âtoo vagueâ and have allowed homes to be built in areas that are so noisy that a flight curfew might have to be introduced.
That is what expert town planner Michael Barlow has told a public inquiry while giving evidence on behalf of the airport, warning the stateâs current planning regime ignores many suburbs that were affected by aircraft noise, creating a âmisconceptionâ about the true extent of the problem.
A plane coming in to land at Melbourne Airport.
These decisions belong with government bodies
We’re sorry, this service is currently unavailable. Please try again later.
Dismiss
January 19, 2021 7.59am
Normal text size
The Age, email letters@theage.com.au. Please include your home address and telephone number.
BUILDING MODERN MELBOURNE
These decisions belong with government bodies
Why should a private corporation, such as Melbourne Airport, have the planning power to stop development because they don’t want curfews or pushback from resident groups (‘‘Airport chiefs eye flight path veto’’,
The Age, 18/1)?
Planning decisions should remain the responsibility of state and local government entities.
As for the reported 20 noise complaints a month, that it is a huge number, because once a resident has registered a noise complaint, their next complaint is not counted again, so this translates to at least 240 new complainants each year.