investigation, did you? we did not. you didn t reprosecute the special counsel report, did you? po we did not. would you agree that you got a lot of questions today that had nothing to do with what you were here to talk about today? i certainly had dseveral. yeah. so i also wonder whether or not that was politicallyo motivate. let s focus on this. what i found interesting was that weat do have people who ar using this asav a platform on t other side of the aisle that says, well, now we need to the we need to look at the fisa process. i don t know why you d use this as a platform to do that. unless you thought that this is a clearho case where the fisa process was abused. and then if you look at this information, this ecosystem of smart people who i think turned a blind eye to damning evidence to serve as a basis for renewing thefo fisa report. it s just beyond my comprehension. of this evidence in yourf report, i think is prett strong. i hope that my colleagues on the
been when some witnesses such as jim morrison recently backs up aspects of the defense that hurts the democrats strategy, lawmakers have pointed that out but have been careful ton divulge too much. they re walking a fine line. pamela brown, cnn, the white house. steve v laddic, a cnn contributor. good to see you. what do you make of the strategy getting infollow guidance from a few republican members of congress? in one sense i think it s not at all surprising. in another sense, i think it s a pretty telling and sober reflex of where we are. we re supposed to have the separation of powers, not parties. yet here we have members of the house who ar supposed to be playing the role of grand jurors helping the puttative defense. it s not as pamela said, not
leaders coming in and meeting together. becauseet kim jong un also travs with ang very large security detail. so you re going to have v president trump if he s not already there or arriving soon showing up i would assume he s going to have people all p around him, perhaps trying to stay out of the shot so that it doesn t look like some sort of military assault, trying to stay out of the camera lens and kim jong un asns well with his security at his back. andty again for those who ar just joining us here on msnbc, what we are waiting and what could be happening right now is that president donald trump could be meeting potentially for that two minutes that he described with kim jong un. there at the demilitaryized zone. that s where richard engel is at the moment. and i believe when we got the notification about 20 minutest ago that now would be that time. weth did see some helicopters g overhead, over the spot where
news feed. if it wouldn t come up naturally, it probably won t come up. it will still be there. it got pushed off youtube. there s no swat team that sits around and like this thing is trending now. is it real? there s none of that going on now. what happened is the washington post found this video. they saw millions of views it had. they brought it to the public s attention, facebook s attention and then they started to take action. there s no system in place. it s still just whack a mole. thanks for your reporting on this. ben collins. next, a one-on-one exclusive with a ji hhadist leader who ar speaking about president trump. you re watching msnbc. eangki abp you re watching msnbc. wake up! there s a lot that needs to get done today. small things. big things. too hard to do alone things. day after day, you need to get it all done.