so i think that s going to be the defense argument. the defense also got the crime scene technician to say on cross-examination there was no chemical testing for blood, commonly known as luminal testing. so it s only what the eye could have observed. since it s raining, some of that blood could have been washed awe away. wouldn t they have needed a lot of rain, faith, to wash away any dna, any blood even under the nails if there was the fight that we were told at one point by the defense that they would need a lot of rain, wouldn t they? right. and there was even testimony today there was no blood on the concrete where george zimmerman his head had been bashed. the defense, all they need to do is plant a seed in the jurors mind that somehow this crime scene was compromised. somehow, someone did not do their job, plant a seed of reasonable doubt in one of those jurors to try to get an acquittal or a hung jury. now, ken, reasonable doubt is clearly something that helps the defense