hi, everyone we start with the fireworks in washington, d.c., today. emanating from the committee set up by the housegop. it took republicans 15 votes now in the days and months that fod followed, the house gop has done nothing except projecting the rest of their colleagues and us to the grievance of lies and conspiracies that animate life over on earth 2 where they live. today a hearing by the so-called weaponization commit presumably focused on censorship on social media and a lawsuit brought by the then-republican attorney general of missouri, he has to be an attorney from missouri, pushing back against efforts by social media to fight disinformation schmidt was one of two witnesses brought forward by republicans, but republican majority on this committee who testified and was dismissed, sent away before democrats could ask one single question so much for a functioning committee in which the free exchange of ideas and sharing of witnesses prevails democrats were justifiabl
CHFL R5 previews: Springbank chasing desperately needed breakthrough thecourier.com.au - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from thecourier.com.au Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
workings of discussions with members of congress. beyond the meadows texts, which he provided to us, which as luke said, show ample communication between the white house and certain members of congress. so i don t know if that evidence exists the focus is on who is lying who is misleading? who is putting forth the strategy that is based mindfully, knowingly, intending to be on falsity that will be their question. and i don t know if that extends to members of congress so a lot of that oh, go ahead, luke. sure. they certainly should have known that the things they were saying was false. i mean, there was ample evidence that they that had been presented. they had lost court case after court case, that they had been paying attention or reading the news in any way, they would have known that the wild claims of election fraud were in fact false. you know, but i guess without questioning under oath and