second question. it is extremely challenging to codify the o bird or failed to fish in that established marriage quality 39 states, because at the time by decision, 35 states in america had or i, constitutional amendments or laws that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman or otherwise banning same-sex marriage. it s hard to legislate, at the federal level, and require all those states to change their laws. instead, what we did, was a little more hung bull in the respect for marriage act. its first repeals the defense of marriage act and takes it off the federal books. second, it says that any lawful marriage, if it was lawful when and where it was entered into must be respected by every
The next time you head to a Lakers game, order the chicken sandwich. Here's a guide to the best food at Staples Center, including fried chicken, cocktails and a beef dip sandwich.
Amerikaanse overheid haalt VPN- en hostingdiensten offline techzine.nl - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from techzine.nl Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
not the democrats. that s who i expected to come after our money. after all, here is what brady and co want to do, they want to move up tax receipts. they want you to pay taxes now on your 401(k) savings. i say that s wrong. any change to the 401(k) will dissuade people from saving. you want it take away my ability to save, but you re not giving me anything else to help me out. i think it s a tragedy and a big mistake. liz: it s infuriating, is it not, michael? the 401(k) is sort of that last little thread hanging from an already shredded tax code, and it really helps people in their later years when they need money because they don t have income. it does. it especially helps middle class people, we don t have pensions as much anymore. those have gone the way of the do-do bird. and when you have social security, which obviously has its own issues when it comes to it, we need to make sure that