to use the judicial system as being a fan of one side or the other. i agree with the guests, this was an appropriate decision maced on the law. i don t believe it was a tech any k589. what they indicated, they can t show that the intelligence that was on the server causely related to deaths. secondary, government officials, myself included when i was one, are protected by a doctrine called immunity, you just can t sue government officials in civil cases, the follow si, sde spite how bad what they did is we don t want government officials afraid to make decisions of the court balances that interest. this doesn t come near a slander case. i feel bad for these two women who lost their sons, they re decent people. but as a lawyer if they came before me, i would have respectfully said your lawsuit will no go nowhere. in the court of public opinion it means something but not a court of law. molly: thank you, bob, rebecca, appreciate you joining us today. thank you. nch thank you.
from obama, so normally a president wouldn t have the option of filling a seat this quickly in the term in their first 100 days. but, yeah, i do agree that trump his rhetoric throughout the campaign indicated that he thought that he could just, you know, kind of like barrel through, implement his agenda, have no problems. he s used to running a business, right? and he repeatedly said that his experience running a business was going to translate to running the country, but the dynamics are completely different. yeah. and the kinds of like multi-party negotiations you have to do are also completely different. you have to answer to basically shareholders, which is the public. you have to deal with members of congress. if you re running a family business, it s completely different. and, yeah, you kind of get why he didn t understand the dynamic going in. the other thing is in politics, you can t sue you can t intimidate people by threatening to sue them, which is a lot of what he
immediately when the new york times story broke. nasty lawyer s letter. which doesn t mean anything to me. i get a lot of nasty lawyers letters. but to a single mom who is not a wealthy person, that was very scary. i told him basically drop dead and talk to me if you have anything to say. and miraculously, i never heard anything further. but we came up with a plan. and the plan was we have got to keep the story alive in the news. this cannot be a one-day story that blows over. that s what fox news wants. and so wendy, we need to do a press conference. of course, she was very nervous about that. but i walked her through everything we were going to do. we had the press conference. i had already gone over with her witnesses, her evidence. my entire law firm has been devoted to this for many weeks. we ve really put aside everything else. the plan was we got to bring down bill o reilly, and we know how to do it. so we then had a conundrum, which was her claims were time barred. she can
keep the story alive in the news. this cannot be a one-day story that blows over. that s what fox news wants. and so wendy, we need to do a press conference. of course, she was very nervous about that. but i walked her through everything we were going to do. we had the press conference. i had already gone over with her witnesses, her evidence. my entire law firm has been devoted to this for many weeks. we ve really put aside everything else. the plan was we got to bring down bill o reilly, and we know how to do it. so we then had a conundrum, which was her claims were time barred. she can t sue. what can we do? as i was scratching my head and trying to figure out the statute of limitations had passed, they were from 2013. and in new york it s a three-year statute of limitation. but then a wonderful gift came out of heaven. and that was fox news saying none of these women have ever called the hotline. and i thought to myself, ah-ha, the hotline. i happen to have a copy of the fox ne
to every passenger on board that flight, stuart. that s important. as you heard trace, united is indeed handing out the cash to others on the flight. now is that the company s way of protecting itself from further lawsuits? lisa joins us right now. so the other people on the flight accept cash. does that mean they can t sue? you know what it is, you don t have the same rates on the plane. so the other people on the plane, no, i don t think they have a lawsuit. in fact, the lawsuit that the doctor has against united is not just about united, right? united may have set everything into motion, but the chicago aviation police are the one that used excessive force. so you can see lawsuits kind of crawl out of the wood work. but you have to look at the legal the law that applies to these cases. in this case, we do have united.