For the second time in two years, the Connecticut Supreme Court has ventured into uncharted waters of LLC governance under the Revised Uniform LLC Act which, to date, has been adopted.
someone have an abortion after six weeks of pregnancy. and we ll listen to brett kavanaugh express concerns first about if states can actually insulate themselves from bans on apportion, what about any other kind of bans on other constitutional rights? let s hear what he had to say. could be free speech rights. could be free exercise of religion rights. could be second amendment rights if this position is accept epied here. the theory of the brief is it could be replicated in other states that favor other constitutional rights. he is concerned about the domino effect here, and i think that was a good, good sign. that, likely, he, and possibly justice barrett, might now be willing to actually vote against texas, at least at this initial stage, and put the law temporarily on hold while lower
The Ninth Circuit recently issued a decision in Cal. River Watch v. City of Vacaville (Case No. 20-16605) (“Vacaville”) regarding the breadth of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
to stay the law while lower court proceedings proceeded would have been an appropriate use of the shadow docket. yet, on august 30th, the court did nothing as the clock struck midnight and texas s law went into effect. hi again, everyone, it s 5:00 in new york. following the supreme court s refusal to block texas s new law that all but bans abortion in the state, there s been a barrage of criticism and harsh scrutiny over the supreme court s shadow docket. now, the shadow docket describes cases where in emergency situations the court makes decisions quickly, skipping the usual exchanges of legal briefs and courtroom arguments. but over the last few years, the practice has been used more frequently and in the case of this texas abortion law, critics say the court s allowing it to continue essentially overturned roe vs. wade. one justice yesterday took offense with detractors of the shadow docket. in unusual comments from a supreme court justice, samuel
department of justice as the defendant and this judge had denied that. that caused the former president and the department of justice to appeal it and in that process, former president lawyer asked the judge to stop all lower court proceedings. what this means now is perhaps she could move forward with this lawsuit. she wants to get documents, records, potentially depose the former president and a copy of his dna, a cheek swab. she s accused donald trump before he was president of rape in a department store dressing room. that s right. she said he raped her in the mid-1990s in a new york department store dressing room. she wrote about this in a book and the former president denied it. that s where she say it was defamation. that s the crux of the case. it does involve the underlying conduct because it goes to truth of the matter. it could open up the door for her litigation to move forward.