look at the socks that he wore with police officers depicted as pigs. he wore it in practice. even don a t-shirt featuring cuban dictator fidel castro during a game against the miami dolphins, nike is now using kaepernick to headline their new ad campaign and the words you see on your screen say believe in something even if it means sacrificing everything. i d like to take a moment to remind mikey representatives that sack fiegs everythirificins not mean a multimillionaire social justice warrior whose greatest feat of victory is kneeling on a football field and wearing no socks against our police officers. those who sacrifice everything can be found on the ground in afghanistan as we speak. u.s. soldiers fighting and dying to keep this country safe. fighting for a cause bigger than themselves. they can be found in the bravery and courage of men and women that protect and serve police, firemen, first responders that run towards danger when we all run away. and they can also be found i
castro. castro was a brutal murdering dictator thug. really? this is nike s let s do it. there is a lot more to colin kaepernick than sartorial decisions. sean: misjudged? maybe purposefully donned, let s say that. did the socks fall on his foot? you re hilarious. sean: just fell on me. there is a lot more to what colin kaepernick has done to drawing attention to racial injustice. that is what this is about and why nike has him. sean: fire departments and police that serve and protect us, do they deserve better than that? better than the socks or the protest? because the socks and the protests are different things. he didn t draw attention to the social justice cause since he draw attention to himself because that s all anybody is talking about. and the only reason that nike did this is because most of their sales come from countries outside of america, so they are playing to the anti-american market and how liberals really
talk to me in a month when the stock goes down. i respect what he does. i think that everybody should have the choice whether they want to stand up or not. i personally do not agree with that type of protest, but if nike chooses him and they think that he has the best one, then so be it. do you think it is smart for businesses to stop with the politics? to mind, yes, but it is where do you draw the line? sean: i set it last season, for me, i do not support boycotts, saturday is my football day. i m just sick and tired of it. too many men fought, bled, died under that flag, it should be one thing that unites the whole country, joining us now, jessica tarlov, cohost of the five you get two shows and watters world, his world or hers, we will find out, i cannot get over the cops as pigs socks and the way that he has depicted all police officers.
from normandy, to the pacific, from vietnam to korea. all across the united states, millions of men and women who have really sacrificed everything for strangers they did not even know. so the world, this country, could be a better, safer, freer place. there are plenty of heroes in this country that nike could feature, but fidel castro loving america, cop hating, ex-backup quarterback is not one of them. this week and we spent tomi lahren out to see what californians thought about nike s new ad. take a look. are you familiar with a gentleman named colin kaepernick. he is a basketball player, right? do you know who colin kaepernick is? i have no idea. i do not watch television. i would not watch this. nike has announced colin kaepernick the new face, did they make a good choice? yes, because he legitimately does protest in a good way. do you think they made a good choice?
we have an ongoing dialogue with the office of special counsel. myself and our colleagues have continued an ongoing dialogue. that dialogue continues. i m not going to discuss the contents of what has been agreed to or not agreed to. but i will tell you this, i am not concerned about the president of the united states responding if we decide to accept the proposition of responding to written questions. responding to questions about the russia and interference with the election. the president s committed, no underlying crime that the president was involved in. i m not concerned about where that goes. and they ask questions and we think they are appropriate, we would respond. we have not even responded to the special counsel sean: but why does counsel the white house counsel spent 30 hours testifying before which to me is mind-blowing. but it seems to me in fact if don mcgahn gave them 30 hours and if the president went in and