this is against federal law to do it. of course, the local law enforcement is pointing at different situations, saying that they had grounds to invade the home. this newspaper executive. time will tell once we get a for the sense of what s going on with the story. but for now, you have a lot of journalists very worked up over this situation. yeah, i mean, look, sarah, you cover this stuff every single day. it s on its face, completely ridiculous. and i think it was stunning and got more stunning every single paragraph i would read about this story over the course of the last several days. what is your sense in terms of whether or not the rationale and justification from law enforcement holds up? my sense is that it doesn t. again, like i said, it s very rare for law enforcement to raid a home like this, in part because we have such strong protections for the press and for the first amendment, that it s typically very hard for them to do something like this. but again, if they re tr
differently. but we just don t have enough details right now, phil, to be able to understand their rationale, which is why i think that this type of situation is unprecedented and probably uncalled for. one of the owner of the paper also tried to get from the judge the probable cause affidavit that would have led to the search warrant, was not able to obtain it because a judge told them that they didn t exist. and i think what is really notable here, they re still trying to get their weekly edition published, sarah. they re working on guests, friends, laptops, acquaintances to get it out on wednesday morning. it just speaks to the dedication to journalism, to the profession. yeah, you ve seen this time and time again throughout the year. remember that las vegas, nevada, journalism reporter who was killed. they still had to get a paper out the next day. i think about a lot of our colleagues in hawaii right now, who print newspapers among big wildfires. this is part of the toughness