The government. But it also goes on to talk about the fact that there is a high bar if you are going to not disclose the information and i just made the determination that it is private and he has not shown us anything different and he is going to have to show us something important. And so everything is flipped on its head leer. Any other questions, or do you want to respond to that . I would like to point out that we dont just rely on the government guide we rely on the advice of the council and the other case law, and to interpret these things and obviously i cant speak to all of that case law, and i am sure that the City Attorney and may be able to do that and that is, to say that we placed the decision solely on a Good Government guide would be false. And it is based on a variety of factor and that is one of them and i am sure that white can elaborate on those much better than i could. I think that we are going to have a discussion of that case law. I have a question for the City
Wrong, we may have had a different conversation, i dont know the out come of that conversation, but our assertion of the privacy rights was bolstered by the fact that we felt that the alleged injustice was sort of in hand, if that makes sense. And so. Any other questions for miss ballard . Or mr. Warren . If i may, mr. Chair, there have been a number of references to the City Attorneys Good Government guide and the references have been on page 89 of our appendix. And the part relating to privacy and it gives, and it gives some examples but the document itself is an advisory document and it has no absolutely no force. And it is the attorney general on this and for the most part they are quite good, but it gives some examples for example, the authorities may protect, the private information from the records from the disclosures and for, if, based on the privacy example interest of individuals, for example, Institution Code section makes confidential records that concern individuals who w
Case in hand but primarily that the issue that mr. Maionchi was attempting to shed light on was already being addressed there was a transfer of a birth from an existing owner who was delinquent on his rent, to a new ownership group. And essentially the existing owner tried to inaudible the new owners and sell him something and actually transfer the boat or the birth. Through the work of our harbor master working with his exwife and the coast guard was able to remedy that situation and the rightful owners got the boat and the lease and there was no money lost in the transaction. And so then, but for the fact that this was happening in as you characterized it as a separate proceedings, and would, or do you agree that the information of address and phone number were relevant . In this case, yes, if we had not already been working with, and we were working directly with the new ownership group, and who also happened to be number one on the wait list for a birth, so had this person actually
That we dont just rely on the government guide we rely on the advice of the council and the other case law, and to interpret these things and obviously i cant speak to all of that case law, and i am sure that the City Attorney and may be able to do that and that is, to say that we placed the decision solely on a Good Government guide would be false. And it is based on a variety of factor and that is one of them and i am sure that white can elaborate on those much better than i could. I think that we are going to have a discussion of that case law. I have a question for the City Attorney and others may as well. The memo refers to the administrative code 12 m2 a as defining the private information and the specific code stating that it should be protected sorry which page are you looking on . I am looking at administrative code 12 and 2 a. But, frankly, i mean, if there are other provisions that would actually directly answer commissioner keanes question, i welcome your thoughts, it seeme