the case of grayson. instead, the doctor essentially put an implant that goes straight to where that sound should go. it s called the cochlear nucleus. it s on the brain stem. you don t need to remember the names here. essentially they re recreating part of the central nervous system so he can take that sound and actually hear. now, the goal obviously is to see how much sense he can make of that sound. we know he s listening to music and will turn it up when he sees the radio or something like that. the doctors are very optimistic he ll be able to process that sound, understand it, turn in the language and start expressing himself in that way as well. that was the goal for them. so far it looks like it s working. he s the first kid in the country to have an auditory brain stem implant. there are nine more children who have been approved for this. we ll keep an eye on it, fred. back to you. that is incredible. thanks so much, dr. sanjay gupta. mission accomplished. what a sweet, sweet
avery friedman in cleveland, richard herman in new york. people are certainly drawing the parallels between the florida case and this in louisiana. well, they should. this is a horrible, horrible case. you don t know what the defense is going to be. maybe he s eating too muchm of those oreos you were talking about earlier. i think in practical terms you have to show if you re prosecuting this case that this youngster was able was capable of formulating a sense of what s right and what s wrong. it s incomprehensible that a young one would do something like this. so look for experts testifying in this case about the mental state and the mental condition of this young defendant because what other possible defense could he possibly have in a case like this? this is just awful. so richard, wwe has issued a statement saying that there was a lack of parental supervision. is that the end of it for them
with. the one state expert basically took it and looped it so it would get long enough that the software program he was using would actually analyze that as a useful piece of information. the defense, of course, has attacked that. back up to you. i think i heard they need at least ten seconds of uninterrupted, unfiltered, that s what their ideal length of time would be. they have like four to five but then you loop it. i get what you re saying there. with regard to other pretrial motions though, is this all that s on the agenda today or are there other ones under consideration? reporter: well, there s some others that the state or that the defense has filgd that have not been heard yes. one in particular is they are asking the court to ban certain phrases and words that the state can use, such as profile, vigilante, wannabe cop, he confronted trayvon martin. they don t want those phrases uttered by state s attorneys. they believe that could injure george zimmerman in the eyes of
recommending that. not flattening the people but killing as many as he needs to. otherwise the regime, a minority of 14 percent, they go down and they do not have a play to live. shepard: if he murders them is that war number four or do we loop it in with war measure three. guest: it is looking likened times in the middle east to me. i don t see any happy news. i got paid to be a testament but it does not look good. shepard: nothing looks good at the moment, nothing but vacation. sorry about the skype, we will figure it out next time. world leader whose got involved in libya are putting on a united front saying muammar qaddafi must go and they are preparing for a political transition. now, the intelligence officials in the united states are saying his inner circle could be
specific numbers as of yet because all they can report is what s reported to them. so they sort of kind of loop it under one specific category. but you have got beware out there if this is going on, if you are having some sort of relationship with someone online and you ve never met them and they re asking you to send them money and they re in the military, number one, the military will bring your loved one home. you to not have to pay for that. number two, if they re asking for money for laptops and technology, for no reason you should have to send money to a third party to get it to them. i want to bring this up. get this in. response from facebook, they said here that there s nothing more important to us than the safety and security of the people who use facebook. it is a violation of our policies to impersonate someone and we disable fake accounts when they re reported to us. talking about online i.d. imp s impersonati impersonation, is it illegal? it appears to be.