everything they do will go up significantly. so some financial help significantly. so some financial help in significantly. so some financial help in that direction might have been help in that direction might have been useful. they re talking about possibly been useful. they re talking about possibly making it more attractive to buy possibly making it more attractive to buy goods for home, more energy efficient to buy goods for home, more energy efficient and the cost they could save by efficient and the cost they could save by investing in those sorts of products i save by investing in those sorts of products. i think a little more than that, products. i think a little more than that, those products. i think a little more than that, those will be welcomed by most people that, those will be welcomed by most eole. , ., that, those will be welcomed by most neale, , ., ., that, those will be welcomed by most eole. v ., ., ., ., people. let s move on to our next -a er
out a key detail, which is that the fact sheet proposal for this thing, and that s all it is david: i said it was a proposal go ahead. it says that they want to look at, they want to look at aggregate outflows and inflows so they want to provide a little more information to the irs that says david asman had way more of an outflow last year than he did five years ago. do you want to look further at that and as you know, the irs already has the power to look further when it thinks there s a problem. david: but this be unlimited, adam and give them an unlimited ability without any court order or anything, doesn t that frighten you at all? not necessarily on the aggregate data. look let s fight about this , but no one is suggesting unlimited going into my bank account which is what you re saying. david: have you read this over, adam? danielle let me switch to you because i have. i ve read it in detail and it does, from my perspective and anybody s able to go in and find