products in the u.s., an order to american companies to bring their businesses back home. david, you were onset with me, all together when the news broke, there s a question of the legality, i don t know, but farce what can actually be done as i see it, a president cannot, i supposed he could cite a national security risk, i mean, there are ways to do it, it s just never been done before taxer doesn t mean that it can t be done but it s as most legal experts say it s more about tone and clearly david: the tone in the past right after he became president he did put the own uis on a lot of businesses to come back and a lot of businesses did come back. certainly did and other areas in the region that may be easier for american manufacturers to work with, we talked about vietnam, for example, as one place in particular, south korea. limits there, steve, that s the point. it s not easy because you have to build infrastructure that
lot of that is targeted to american cars, auto parts, when chinese people buy anything u.s. auto related, long story short, they will pay more, 5% on auto parts, the products chosen very much with purpose, the chinese government is targeting american made products in western states, president trump as you recall carried states in 2016 election, he needs to win them to rewin the election, michigan and ohio, biggest concentration obviously of auto manufacturing and the michigan race so close in 2016. iowa, largest producer of soybeans and that s a product that the chinese have also targeted. here are some other american product it is chinese businesses, chinese consumers will pay more for. you have coffee, shrimp, oysters, ice cream, beer, sparkling wine. china plans to copy u.s. schedule, two batches
fisa courts operated in much too hazard fashion in accepting information that was not verified like the trump dossier in order to spy on american citizens, if not more, might there be rule changes specifically with regard to fisa courts that result from this? well, i think that there definitely needs to be a review of how the fisa court itself handled the information they received and, of course, if information was tendered to them that was not properly vetted, the court itself should have some serious concerns about how they were treated by the fbi when they sought that fisa warrant. david: congressman, good luck to you, a lot of things to investigate here, we appreciate you coming in, thanks a million. thank you, david. david: are tax cuts coming, more tax cuts, the president s top economic adviser larry kudlow up
be able to do it, that s what they said about a lot of things, obama fed chair said there won t be a recession. another 2020 democrat out of the race, 2020 presidential candidate and ohio democrat congressman tim ryan, he s joining us next. music (plays throughout): [ watch me walk by spencer ludwig ] yo dj, can i put in a request? don t have no sass about this i m on my way i m on my way can t take no class about this i m on my way i m on my like this! this is a moment you plan for. to start your investment plan, find an advisor at massmutual.com sfx: [ mnemonic ]
you re looking at me perplexed and with a trade war let s be clear about this. this is a new york times headlines, they re not trump fans. face it you probably got a tax cut. they re associated with liberal organizations saying that 65% of taxpayers got a tax cut. only 6% actually paid more in their taxes, but that s a problem for republicans because they did not message that well in 2018, did they? well, i mean, a lot of media didn t want to report the real fax about the tax cuts and jobs act. david: with an about republicans duty to report if they didn t want to be reelected. a lot of them weren t as a result of not reporting that in 2018. the president is pushing facts about what happened and people that benefitted from the bottom to the top and benefitted from the tax act.