power by the fbi and absolutely both merrick garland,rn the attorney general and the fbieydi director , christopher, they would have so they would have to have signed off on ths . you would agree with that, correct? oh, absolutely. they i mean, look, no agent or t official at the fbi is going to undertake a raid of this magnitude on the formerth president of the united states without going to the individuals at the very top . that s garland and ray. all right.. let sch talk about two other cases, professor dershowitz, and then i ll get your overall view on this particular raid that that went on earlier today. james comey was accused pretty much of something very similar, if you ll recall, if you remember the case of sandy berger, sandy berger went intowe the national archives, he literally shoved documents down into his on his in his backside into his socks and walked out with those documents. but then everybody inn the media, every democratedia, e was just sloppy, very sloppy
and hillary clinton and her shenanigans. and i don t remember a raid herr eron her home. no, look, there were classified documents that were inn the possession of hillary clinton. hill them innghe havee a non classified setting, she destroyed them in the irs case. i issued a subpoena trying tohe get the documents that surrounding the lois lerner case. and guess what? the irs nevere looked at them.h that was the conclusion of the inspector general. and then ge even though they wereas under subpoena, they were destroyed. nobody was prosecuted, let alone a raid on the house of o john koskinen. the irs commissioner, ory hillary rodham clinton. they never did anyer of that. o they barely lifted a finger. so i think one of the key questions is were they under subpoena? but i got to tell you, my experience with donald trump is open and transparent as anybody that we ever interacted t with . remember, at the very beginning of the trump presidency, he met with then prime minister abe. and there
downloaded classified top secret documents, thereby jeopardizing national security and violating the espionage, not once or ten times, but roughly 100 hundred timese counting the number ofnu classified documents that she essentially stole and as i say,, jeopardized national securityna to hacks.ks and we,, in fact have pretty solid evidence that her serveran was hacked and foreign agencies retrieved american top secret of hercu because actions. would she ever prosecuted? no. james comeyte stood in front of television cameras and he identified all the crimes shepp committed and then did a pirouette in the course of five seconds and said but no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. thousands of reasonable prosecutors would have loved toe have brought that case. and besidesbesi, james comey ist the prosecuting authority he
0 the administrative state and i don t thinkve s it s going to sp here, will , i m afraid that they might try to indict trump with a rigged grandbe jury befoe the midterms. i think it ll be watching that . i appreciate you jumping on here at the end of the show.. i appreciate you watching me tonight. filling in for tucker carlson. going away. not obviously you ll have excellent coverage starting right now with sean hannity, keith olbermann and welcome to hannity. and tonight we start with a foxw newsit alert. eric trump will joinin us in a moment live. tas he was with his dad all day today. he ll give us an inside scoop first. a dark day for our republic, the department of justice, the rule of law, what looks to be potentially a shocking overreach. we ll find out innl time thaton will have serious ramifications potentiallys for many, many years to come. biden s politically charged have already chronicled all this. doj is now being i used as a weapon against biden s top political rival.
this is just a matter of lawaw enforcement going in and recovering this material that needs to be recovered or finding it where it is hidden. if i were the attorney r general of the united states, i would be very concerned about what the fbi did here and i would send in independent law enforcement like the u.s. marshals to secure and recover this evidence. a tucker: i am concerned. these are not favors that they are asking. if you are a member of congress on a committee investigating something or a citizen filing under the freedom of information act, you have a legal right to these democrats. if a government bureaucrat lies to you or withholds them, what is the penalty? could be obstruction of justice, obstruction ofe, congress, destruction of government property tucker: are charges ever brought on these grounds? they are if you re not hillary clinton. tucker: were they in the hillary clinton case or the lois lerner case? anyone go to jail for lying about that? no. tuck