election. the way he responded to that is by creating an alternate universe in which he did not lose the election and the country is paying the price. three times. three times? losing in 2020, the new york attorney general case and now the 34 counts. the attorney general case with the massive penalty. you are right to point it out with the devastating nature of the blow in that case. hundreds of millions of dollars that he owes and now in this criminal case. he does not have the option to do it he did with losing the 2020 election. he does not have the option to say that didn t really happen. let s have an alternate universe in which the penalty did not happen, the liability did not happen and the criminal convictions did not happen. from your sense of how he moves through the world and deals with humiliation and failure, what do you think he has left to do that he can do in response to this that we should be prepared for? is going to blame everybody other than hims
and neither did melania. you have to ask yourself the question why? i can understand why melania didn t to be honest with you. hush money case, the whole notion of donald having this sexual relationship not just with stormy daniels, but with karen mcdougal as well. i m sure melania was trying to preserve her own sense of identity and maybe to protect t barron as well. you wouldn t invoke melania trump repeatedly, which they did, including blaming her for coming up with the locker room talk defense to the access hollywood. they introduced her to the jury. that s why i wondered she never showed up. andrew weissmann is not in this room and i think we can
language. and this is an important issue. he s not going to apologize for trying to fix our immigration system. of course he s not going to apologize. this is the same as the supposed locker room talk defense after the xld k38d tape. it wasn t about the word, it was about how the president thinks about women, just like how this is about the president s racist thinking, not some vague concept of strong language. francis tarngs here s some strong language a multimedia artist projected onto the main entrance of the trump international hotel in washington. now, as you know, the president gave an example of norway as a country he wants immigrants to come from. we all know what that is. the homeland security secretary was asked about that today. norway is a predominantly white country, right? i actually do not know that, sir, but i imagine that is the case. kirsten nielsen doesn t know for sure is norway is predominantly white. norway. let me just repeat that. the secretary for homel
trying to fix our immigration system. of course he s not going to apologize. this is the same as the supposed locker room talk defense after the access hollywood tape. it wasn t about the word. it was about how the president thinks about women, just like this is about the president s racist thinking, not some vague concept of strong language. for instance, here s some strong language multimedia artists projected on to the hotel in washington. as you know, the president gave norway as an example of where he wants immigrants to come from. we all know what that means. the homeland security secretary was asked about it today. norway is a predominantly white country, isn t it? i m i i actually do not know that, sir, but i imagine that is the case. kirstjen nielsen doesn t know for sure if norway is predominantly white. norway. let me just repeat that. the secretary for homeland security claims she doesn t know for sure if norway is