a top democrat is worried the senate will reject lo redia lynch. i mean is that a possibility? could this qualified woman be rejected? well the more this continues and gets delayed, we ve been around i know i ve been around long enough to know things can go wrong, we are saying they could have voted for her today. surely what we want to do is we ll be in the district offices over the easter break and be there on april 13th. they should may that the first order of business to take care of this. the vote couldn t be tighter, e.j., than it is now. the only 2k78 to say he s undecided it bob menendez who is sunday investigation by the agency that lynch would lead. could some sort of retribution hold things up? i can imagine senator
would have been able to throw you off of their ranks had it i m not politicizing what she s done. what i m simply saying is kudos and masses and mazel tov to her doing it and prior to that they could not do that. ted cruz announced yesterday he was running for president, and he will sign into law a repeal of every word of obamacare. she s a prime example of why we should never in a billion years elect ted cruz or anyone else who hates obamacare to be president of the united states. sorry to say it, but i mean it. today another republican is coming out against lo redia lynch for attorney general. after meeting with lynch, senator shelly moore said her views are troubling to me and said she wasn t sure lynch
that anyone would have an issue with respect to her qualifications. for this one politician to cher hi-pick this one issue and say that only reason is the reason why she would do everything in her power to block lo redia lynch s nomination is disturbing to me. we ve already seen the level of work that the department of justice does. we looked at the ferguson report that just came out. the people of america need a top law enforcement officer. but terrorism and other areas, and i think, jimmy, that if you don t have any blemish on your record and if you ve shown to be a quality prosecutor they re making a mockery out of the whole process by doing this jimmy. right. of course whoever a president appoints tends to view certain things in terms of the interpretation of law that is closer to that president, but certainly they sometime end up investigating that president.
foundation, the bare bones of what a campaign at least substantively will look like? absolutely. in fact we have a story on our website today about the fact that hillary clinton is already laying the groundwork for the first woman president theme that s going to carry through. people are going to she is going to try to make the witch to women that you have to vote for the first woman president. the republican congress, of course, is giving her some of those issue toss play with, when they block bills because they have an abortion rider on there. that s playing right into her strategy. that s good for her. i think you ll see a lot of these issues where they re social issues playing into her strength, which is i m the only woman running for this office. the washington post also writing like his 1990s spread says ore newt gingrich, house speaker john boehner faces near-constant calls from his planks, but one of his own
night there was a bomb threat. minutes before these agents drove onto the complex, a woman jumps out of her car, throwing a strange-looking green package onto the grounds and yells in a series of epithets this is a bomb. it s immediately cordoned off. congressman cummings said by their own policy, they should have retained all sorts of video all over the place, because there was a serious incident. whether they thought the agents driving onto the complex a big threat, the bomb threat was. we ll be reading your stories and have you back. thank you. up next hillary clinton might not officially be running yet, but she s giving more clues how she ll run when she gets