The look back to what happened in 2016 certainly was part of the thing he was worried about. To be clear. What you just described is a quid pro quo. Its funding will not flow unless the investigation into the democratic server happened as well. We do that all the time with Foreign Policy. I have news for everybody. Get over it. Theres going to be political influence in Foreign Policy. Those comments didnt go over so well with Mick Mulvaneys boss. A source close to the president said he was not happy. And white house lawyers are privately pretty worried as well. That likely explains why mulvaney later tried to put the genie back in the bottle claiming in a statement what he said in front of the whole world earlier that day wasnt really what he said at all, jim. Its almost orwellian, but weve seen this. All of this happening at the same time and no coincidence while u. S. Ambassador to the eu, Gordon Sondland, was testifying to congress that President Trump told him and other diplomats o
The Broadside (Transcript): The toxic spill that left a legacy of change wunc.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from wunc.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
and where other countries tax the superrich, that s i think those are fair rates. 70%, france. you look at those numbers. you can look at different countries that s the most extreme. but fair rates. i think we should have the conversation. fair enough. a welt tax. talked about on the debate stage a lot in week. do you think a wealth fax is the solution in liz baier beth warren says it is. i m looking for systemic change. i m not lacking for transactional slugs. i think transactional slaugss are a mistake. things that are surgical i think are actually inappropriate and exacerbate the problem. i think we should look for ways to create a new capitalism. i want to have an approach based on all stakeholders. my responsibility isn t just to the shareholders in the company but to all of those stakeholders. breaking up big tech. it s a popular line on the campaign trail. we heard it on the debate stage. do you support it?